Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 26 Sep 2022 17:33:12 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To:     Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com>
Cc:     borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, svens@linux.ibm.com,
        linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, agordeev@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] s390/qeth: Convert snprintf() to scnprintf()
Message-ID: <20220926173312.7a735619@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <YzHyniCyf+G/2xI8@fedora>
References: <YzHyniCyf+G/2xI8@fedora>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 19:42:38 +0100 Jules Irenge wrote:
> Coccinnelle reports a warning
> Warning: Use scnprintf or sprintf
> Adding to that, there has been a slow migration from snprintf to scnprintf.
> This LWN article explains the rationale for this change
> https: //lwn.net/Articles/69419/
> Ie. snprintf() returns what *would* be the resulting length,
> while scnprintf() returns the actual length.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com>

Looks legit but please repost this separately.
We only see patch 3 of the series.