From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Please release a stable kernel Linux 3.0
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:00:07 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5
Cc: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>,
       =?iso-8859-1?q?Zolt=E1n_HUBERT?= <zoltan.hubert@zzaero.com>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <200706212349.54983.zoltan.hubert@zzaero.com> <9a8748490706211529yca0588dgd1f7e0b86f7e4a62@mail.gmail.com> <467AFCEC.2070203@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <467AFCEC.2070203@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200706221700.08135.rjw@sisk.pl>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 926
Lines: 27

On Friday, 22 June 2007 00:34, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On 06/21/2007 06:29 PM, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > 
> > I myself have argued that we should be focusing more on stability and
> > regression fixing, but I'm not so sure that a 2.6.7 devel branch would
> > solve this. In general the 2.6.x.y -stable kernels seem to be doing
> > the job pretty good.
> > 
>  
> Even the good ones that get lots of fixes aren't all that good. The
> biggest problem ATM is that suspend is badly broken and keeps getting
> worse...

Can you please provide me with any links to suspend-related bug reports from
you?

Greetings,
Rafael


-- 
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/