Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <cde8be9d-64c0-80e5-7663-4302d075dcbc@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Sep 2022 09:46:07 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.3.0
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 9/9] kvm_main.c: handle atomic memslot update
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>,
        kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20220909104506.738478-1-eesposit@redhat.com>
 <20220909104506.738478-10-eesposit@redhat.com>
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Organization: Red Hat
In-Reply-To: <20220909104506.738478-10-eesposit@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 09.09.22 12:45, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
> When kvm_vm_ioctl_set_memory_region_list() is invoked, we need
> to make sure that all memslots are updated in the inactive list
> and then swap (preferreably only once) the lists, so that all
> changes are visible immediately.
> 
> The only issue is that DELETE and MOVE need to perform 2 swaps:
> firstly replace old memslot with invalid, and then remove invalid.
> 

I'm curious, how would a resize (grow/shrink) or a split be handled?

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb