Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758773AbXFVQUc (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jun 2007 12:20:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757824AbXFVQUW (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jun 2007 12:20:22 -0400 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:41131 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757416AbXFVQUV (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jun 2007 12:20:21 -0400 Message-ID: <467BF69D.4030806@goop.org> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 09:19:41 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070615) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Wright CC: Ingo Molnar , Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -rt] CONFIG_PARAVIRT and CONFIG_MCOUNT don't play well together References: <20070622080634.GP3723@sequoia.sous-sol.org> <20070622083330.GB19382@elte.hu> <20070622152915.GQ3723@sequoia.sous-sol.org> In-Reply-To: <20070622152915.GQ3723@sequoia.sous-sol.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 580 Lines: 15 Chris Wright wrote: > Yes, I agree, it's actually documenting the subtlety of the calling > convention, not just noise in the source. The upstream patch is > different, I'll sort one out. I wonder if we should use something like "regparm" rather than "fastcall"? The latter makes it sound like its just a performance issue. J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/