Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <dd89a30e-5403-8844-036c-9c9107cac888@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Sep 2022 15:19:29 +0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.13.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/CoC: Reflect current CoC interpretation and
 practices
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20220926211149.2278214-1-kristen@linux.intel.com>
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220926211149.2278214-1-kristen@linux.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 9/27/22 04:11, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> The Code of Conduct interpretation does not reflect the current
> practices of the CoC committee or the TAB. Update the documentation
> to remove references to initial committees and boot strap periods
> since it is past that time, and note that the this document
> does serve as the documentation for the CoC committee processes.
> 

When was the bootstrap period be concluded?

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara