Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 27 Sep 2022 10:19:45 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
        f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com,
        slade@sladewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.19 000/207] 5.19.12-rc1 review
Message-ID: <YzKyIfQUq9eRbomG@kroah.com>
References: <20220926100806.522017616@linuxfoundation.org>
 <CA+G9fYtxogp--B0Em6VCL0C3wwVFXa6xW-Rq2kQk3br+FPGLgg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+G9fYtxogp--B0Em6VCL0C3wwVFXa6xW-Rq2kQk3br+FPGLgg@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 01:25:52PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sept 2022 at 16:13, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.12 release.
> > There are 207 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 28 Sep 2022 10:07:26 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.19.12-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.19.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> Results from Linaro's test farm.
> No regressions on arm, x86_64, and i386.
> Following deadlock warning noticed on arm64 with kselftests Kconfigs.

Is this new?  If so, what commit causes it?

thanks,

greg k-h