Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <f0c27a5b-fee2-eb64-6855-639e7ea65d37@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Sep 2022 15:27:24 +0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.13.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/CoC: Reflect current CoC interpretation and
 practices
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20220926211149.2278214-1-kristen@linux.intel.com>
 <dd89a30e-5403-8844-036c-9c9107cac888@gmail.com> <YzKyqNJk72TY//42@kroah.com>
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <YzKyqNJk72TY//42@kroah.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 9/27/22 15:22, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> When was the bootstrap period be concluded?
> 
> I do not understand the question, sorry.  What exactly are you asking
> here?
> 
> confused,
> 
> greg k-h

Hi Greg,

In the patch, the mention to bootstrap period of CoC committee is
replaced with note about dynamic nature of CoC interpretation. I asked
when the duration of bootstrap period was before we got into status quo.

Thanks.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara