Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>,
        Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
        Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
        Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
        Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
In-Reply-To: <YzIuiUul2CwPlkKh@work>
References: <YzIuiUul2CwPlkKh@work>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Replace zero-length arrays with DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() helper
Message-Id: <166428358688.365276.7811132471034976434.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 27 Sep 2022 13:59:46 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 17:58:17 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Zero-length arrays are deprecated and we are moving towards adopting
> C99 flexible-array members, instead. So, replace zero-length arrays
> declarations in anonymous union with the new DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY()
> helper macro.
> 
> This helper allows for flexible-array members in unions.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Replace zero-length arrays with DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() helper
      commit: 6fed3265c3c811c79819860051375f6d7efc1d7e

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark