Received: by 2002:a05:6359:c8b:b0:c7:702f:21d4 with SMTP id go11csp1011041rwb; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 07:22:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7nTslSAnJ69XvHenC6m/dcT94sCNVLVDfSo97exzi+Ee98HQlsWM9pLu4K2Jwqv2OOve0L X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1a87:b0:202:6b60:be62 with SMTP id ng7-20020a17090b1a8700b002026b60be62mr4773195pjb.69.1664288543355; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 07:22:23 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1664288543; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ESPSwGolxQGQr8neT96chLozN7RkJ1bqc3YbJUKK2qa1WkzGHBRNbColS409wK9KlE vtENRuDllbS5ICoRUO2wie/nhCu31oCKlMpswOhtAW4ggvg2h/Wk5GU8WlNOxLejZwIG qaTh7HzwlzyF5GFsRZzILBuw2QXUBixLo1hIH1QA6L6T2rI/Gk8gWa9XsneumpFhnoRi GYmkDXt0KqAcvGbcCUIrvoFb/0bkJ2LYKeThPsAwsR0lYT3uZFiN88xJ63dYuBSupWgh fC4idkalb8AvAHmv1eBqFrTPUrzKkpejwqLWfys3IKw6A27nvmZw2KnbzeVqudRZvCc8 UpSA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=zzApm3YbxwwBjwPAWZr5XX6s78O6jQ2TeF6um5gEkMM=; b=nTWeg1aWCp9CZFiWKpXr/HgpHiNphicw0yJn8Bzt1L54dcVe+lccBFqSjylFkA7BAo pvWrXeD6/UVTkInhs8EaeRQD/tEkAPYuuzoKVP3VGmsAqluL0pnNYhx/b0XroSnJs1xI 2JF64xoSCut4pKnoeRX5eUIC/PLm3dV6MSpoAspqM52lTDWA9XTuhO36MOrtF2hgLZVa YyMX+JqT9BSqKi/8/frcCnVIpAATBu0eVo1EmGLqDg9xEuehraIwpTMtDslqEM1R8724 qwHFZrQHERUqV691msbU8rQHhmu843bSrHhhbVjK36ogOm1kE++F93OA8wakRNii+k8B Gr4g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b="Tgt/Bk37"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t17-20020a056a00139100b0050d80e4935fsi2537810pfg.256.2022.09.27.07.22.11; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 07:22:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b="Tgt/Bk37"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232098AbiI0OHq (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 27 Sep 2022 10:07:46 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53548 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232964AbiI0OHh (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2022 10:07:37 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4DF31B14CC; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 07:07:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D48FB619A2; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 14:07:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46B69C433D7; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 14:07:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1664287648; bh=zzApm3YbxwwBjwPAWZr5XX6s78O6jQ2TeF6um5gEkMM=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=Tgt/Bk37cdmUoLab/DzCiZNmw556sPsOitMXLHG5Iwyqich9nRnqN8oQTw/9ipZ0/ KHpy5p3I2qeLyA5Dv9S5V8sYmevqfmN13hWVJ79dYWv0r2cHCyamG2YNX0I1DESeNb jcMKvFeAOEt/eT7Zfjt/945TpNtOocVUdkmVP881v39ZETFYdoeIuVMFC2wl+kQMVX PL+untVUNajXQq3KVLG6Ha1fvFPjHfUzSoJShjyy1aQpHpZBcMOGYKmosipY/RS1VF 75MDi6YcucHwxj7Y0CdH2dqpDOqna1D7D54my3uClW4ty0veSYx08B5JC7jj7yOWgA 7q5Ls2fJtBTQA== Received: by mail-vs1-f54.google.com with SMTP id j17so9780360vsp.5; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 07:07:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3XPQoSO2oFg71mJikKPbcv2IHG45bPyxbA6HbKJ+FboBkX2a0C b7aDfQHuIyBzf7cIM4wFZy4BN64tH0Gn1HKnjA== X-Received: by 2002:a67:c18a:0:b0:398:4c72:cafb with SMTP id h10-20020a67c18a000000b003984c72cafbmr10416210vsj.53.1664287647289; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 07:07:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220918094915.19567-1-yuanjilin@cdjrlc.com> <20220926185852.GA2581083-robh@kernel.org> <8821ae25-eb20-b673-6d57-fb2cc03d9726@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8821ae25-eb20-b673-6d57-fb2cc03d9726@gmail.com> From: Rob Herring Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 09:07:15 -0500 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: device: fix repeated words in comments To: Bagas Sanjaya Cc: Jilin Yuan , frowand.list@gmail.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 7:47 AM Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > > On 9/27/22 19:29, Rob Herring wrote: > >> Hi Rob, > >> > >> Some reviewers sent comments for similar patches from @cdjrlc.com > >> people (including myself at [1]), with some of them requesting changes. > >> However, there are never any responses to these reviews from @cdjrlc.com > >> people, just like ZTE developers sending through cgel.zte ignored > >> review comments [2] (try searching `f:"cdjrlc.com" AND s:"Re:"`, it returns > >> nothing for now). > > > > I can't decide whether to fix it correctly myself or leave it to see > > how many times I can get the same patch. :) > > > > Hi Rob, > > I'm not talking about whether this patch should be picked up or not, but > rather I'm pointing out the ignoring review behavior of @cdjrlc.com people. Yes, I get that. Not responding seems to be a growing behavior not just on these trivial type patches. (Though replying with 'ok' to every review comment is equally annoying.) I suppose there could be some filtering happening such that replies are never received. Rob