Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <b0981cb5a97452af73b9dd0dd0eb03c5002f7af4.1664285626.git.geert+renesas@glider.be>
 <fe2b1f48-e18a-b1d9-0c62-ddddf9e6515f@arm.com> <CAMuHMdVFAwqVtrRFf-_jSODWeJuGAzbpoyk65HDOqj9h6AUt2A@mail.gmail.com>
 <9db42ab0-da49-95fd-3fea-eb505af0867e@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <9db42ab0-da49-95fd-3fea-eb505af0867e@arm.com>
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date:   Tue, 27 Sep 2022 17:29:38 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdW1KQ5TTftYuTT4_b6mmCT5Y+_jpSKau46-g8siDKWjGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/io-pgtable: Make IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE_DART invisible
To:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc:     Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Sven Peter <sven@svenpeter.dev>, Janne Grunau <j@jannau.net>,
        Hector Martin <marcan@marcan.st>, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Robin,

On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 5:09 PM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> wrote:
> On 2022-09-27 15:48, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 4:15 PM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> wrote:
> >> On 2022-09-27 14:36, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >>> There is no point in asking the user about both "Apple DART Formats" and
> >>> "Apple DART IOMMU Support", as the former is useless without the latter,
> >>> and the latter auto-selects the former.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: 745ef1092bcfcf3b ("iommu/io-pgtable: Move Apple DART support to its own file")
> >>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> >>> ---
> >>> Should IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE_LPAE and IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE_ARMV7S be made
> >>> invisible, too?
> >>> Are there users that do not select them?
> >>
> >> The aim was for formats to be independently selectable for COMPILE_TEST
> >> coverage. The Arm formats are manually selectable for the sake of their
> >> runtime self-tests, which are self-contained, but since DART format
> >> doesn't do anything by itself I'd agree there's no need to prompt when
> >> !COMPILE_TEST here.
> >
> > IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE_LPAE and IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE_ARMV7S are
> > selected by other symbols that can be enabled when compile-testing, so
> > the tests can still be enabled in those cases, too
>
> Sure, but when you want to compile-test a thing, what would you rather
> do: enable the thing, or go hunting to find some other thing that
> happens to select the thing you actually want, then potentially have to
> figure out *that* thing's dependencies, and so on?

Agreed.

> Coverage isn't solely about whether it's technically possible to ever
> reach somewhere at all, it's just as much about how easily and/or often
> you can get there in practice. I don't see who benefits from making
> COMPILE_TEST harder to use :/

So perhaps the visibility of IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE_LPAE and
IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE_ARMV7S should depend on COMPILE_TEST?
Normal users would still get it through select when needed.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds