Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To:     Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        LF TAB <tech-board@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/CoC: Reflect current CoC interpretation
 and practices
In-Reply-To: <a9a569566c2771621f170d017ce981dcfff2b1e7.camel@linux.intel.com>
References: <20220926211149.2278214-1-kristen@linux.intel.com>
 <87h70tpw6d.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
 <a9a569566c2771621f170d017ce981dcfff2b1e7.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Sep 2022 10:03:50 -0600
Message-ID: <87sfkcolcp.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com> writes:

>> > +neutral third party.=C2=A0 The processes the Code of Conduct committee
>> > will
>> > +use to address reports is varied and will depend on the individual
>
> Eek, I see a small error here - it should either say "The processes the
> Code of Conduct committee will use to address reports are varied"
> OR
> "The process the Code of Conduct committee will use to address reports
> is varied"
>
> Perhaps this can be fixed when it is added to a tree, or let me know if
> you would like another version.

I can tweak it, no worries.

Thanks,

jon