Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 28 Sep 2022 08:16:33 +0200
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To:     Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@mm-sol.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= <kw@linux.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
        linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: qcom: Add support for modular builds
Message-ID: <YzPmwWeSu9OVWwMf@hovoldconsulting.com>
References: <20220721064720.10762-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org>
 <Yyl+PNcbtSwzlgvh@hovoldconsulting.com>
 <YzL6aS6mktksLnqn@lpieralisi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YzL6aS6mktksLnqn@lpieralisi>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 03:28:09PM +0200, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 10:47:56AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > Hi Lorenzo,
> > 
> > On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 08:47:20AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > Allow the Qualcomm PCIe controller driver to be built as a module, which
> > > is useful for multi-platform kernels as well as during development.
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > Changes in v2
> > >  - rebase on next-20220720 (adjust context)
> > >  - add Rob and Mani's reviewed-by tags
> > 
> > Have you had a change to look at this one since you got back from
> > vacation?
> > 
> > I believe this should be uncontroversial as we already have other
> > modular dwc drivers and there's no mapping of legacy INTx interrupts
> > involved.
> 
> Sincere apologies for the delay.
> 
> I am afraid it does look controversial - I need some time to go through
> the full discussion and make up my mind, unfortunately we are late in
> the cycle and I am dealing with the patch backlog, I believe this may
> end up being a discussion targeting the v6.2 merge window I am afraid.

No worries. Thanks for taking a look.

Johan