Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 28 Sep 2022 11:14:37 +0200
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To:     Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Cc:     Ren Zhijie <renzhijie2@huawei.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        ndesaulniers@google.com, nathan@kernel.org, vbabka@suse.cz,
        masahiroy@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, seanjc@google.com,
        hannes@cmpxchg.org, ojeda@kernel.org, mhiramat@kernel.org,
        dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, atomlin@redhat.com, ddiss@suse.de,
        christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] init/Kconfig: fix unmet direct dependencies
Message-ID: <YzQQfW3h70OIiT14@linutronix.de>
References: <20220928064934.70867-1-renzhijie2@huawei.com>
 <YzPxMvjdjVEK1/b1@linutronix.de>
 <CAKXUXMxGt9UGhw9Ap_M3U2AF1vw2dX7WpDO71=UwV0Be3t4sNw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In-Reply-To: <CAKXUXMxGt9UGhw9Ap_M3U2AF1vw2dX7WpDO71=UwV0Be3t4sNw@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On 2022-09-28 09:20:42 [+0200], Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > Couldn't this become a depends?
> It could also be a depends (to resolve the warning).
=E2=80=A6
> It is just the question whether:
>=20
> When PROC_FS is not set, should the CHECKPOINT_RESTORE still be
> visible as a config option to add (and then automatically add
> PROC_FS)? Then select is right here.

then CHECKPOINT_RESTORE is the only option selecting PROC_FS while
everyone else depends on it _or_ avoids using it in the absence of
PROC_FS.

Sebastian