Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
From:   Jens Glathe <jens.glathe@oldschoolsolutions.biz>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] usb: xhci: add XHCI_SPURIOUS_SUCCESS to ASM1042 despite being a V0.96 controller
Date:   Wed, 28 Sep 2022 18:39:55 +0200
Message-Id: <69D84895-3353-46F6-A21B-3A448003DCB8@oldschoolsolutions.biz>
References: <c1d537ad-5a2d-24b1-bfc3-165deebbbfa7@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     mathias.nyman@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        stern@rowland.harvard.edu
In-Reply-To: <c1d537ad-5a2d-24b1-bfc3-165deebbbfa7@linux.intel.com>
To:     Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

Thank you, will do. This us part of the mail, not the patch, right?

Von meinem iPhone gesendet

> Am 28.09.2022 um 17:23 schrieb Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>:
> 
> ﻿On 26.9.2022 22.31, Jens Glathe wrote:
>> This appears to fix the error:
>> "xhci_hcd <address>; ERROR Transfer event TRB DMA ptr not part of
>> current TD ep_index 2 comp_code 13" that appear spuriously (or pretty
>> often) when using a r8152 USB3 ethernet adapter with integrated hub.
>> ASM1042 reports as a 0.96 controller, but appears to behave more like 1.0
>> Inspred by this email thread: https://markmail.org/thread/7vzqbe7t6du6qsw3
>> Signed-off-by: Jens Glathe <jens.glathe@oldschoolsolutions.biz>
> 
> Adding this to queue
> 
>> ---
> 
> In the future, As Alan also pointed out, please list the changes since last version here.
> 
> Something like:
> 
> changes since v2
> - add subsystem to subject line
> - removed host 0.96 version check
> 
> Thanks
> -Mathias