Received: by 2002:a05:6359:c8b:b0:c7:702f:21d4 with SMTP id go11csp1225480rwb; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 15:17:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5Swr9erLJlG5lWzSFDWsCoSsbkCR5N51oQhFPflrCPjOQZGmOAZ8DmSOl5Yj+OjdFU62u5 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:8a6c:b0:781:6a4a:11d4 with SMTP id hy12-20020a1709068a6c00b007816a4a11d4mr109525ejc.14.1664403454494; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 15:17:34 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1664403454; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qnZ9xnIVYaDCHzbgCMd4rz9rqNm5+dMrY9a+0hpNv3uGVW4gXB6iv1AaBgdj2FtGkV q6bHuHn2fB/ijZZU62Uhsmk7JufwJIAE9h0fA3qDM0//nXIPxc1lm6nMJ6azF3FdhVpn JCLHSamrvmK1rByGPIXiTspLBHmPRIsjXltDU6h9qiFeus/6PwM4mZfwG8IJeNzTsjkW lN4QJxLeydXOJnlNAHl6sYDTFZPtWU8ZWBaCynLjlpbRQguY5utKKVIpDgy36eT60iPI ZZsAPD8DX0ReTZBcjn9oGGoVj6RkbdV87TFxXD9PJgZm6PK2U7TrpUQgVk/uVzKRVA2W UWRw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=ipYuzGxWm5uWwV1gF8Dj2ieAXtdkkdN8NdAlgh+K2pY=; b=kOpHaiRj/cmu6/R8l/WhpXLcP/YgdivHsInCo8BnD2ssjF6Zu4gLPjYdUkDqnITyiC cJFu8ynoOjBYusobJLG5svzIusqq6n2I6kVu/HK+TIiJlbE5AMpoMNEc4O9lkKSK820l El9drqsf9+xrMAx4/kkMrzc+u/q6vvROCXTLgK+PgpPojmuUcw4BA7NOdeMJUuyqCw5l pIEy5EktGuR0ASkTQRHfKRuIeofSvZlt6OgX6yIZkBOgR3UjKdqO0J7TxBCNCHj833Wk hqYTyND9/yHHKEtIi+r+Xi6HZr/cJmylp3y+zWG/dKe/ukDj92/jo87TLRfc4/Y5eY8n Z+2w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=MFj660pB; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ji22-20020a170907981600b0073d5b605cefsi7181796ejc.261.2022.09.28.15.17.06; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 15:17:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=MFj660pB; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234533AbiI1VqF (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 28 Sep 2022 17:46:05 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59016 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234517AbiI1VqB (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2022 17:46:01 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E35090802; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 14:45:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94E7B61FE6; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 21:45:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA194C433D6; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 21:45:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1664401559; bh=ZImTpZIu1Oe/UGX3YTfpv34oAqqGDVjjQAwxKC7tMS0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=MFj660pBOrMYHQoas/9wCNwNCnFH8hiE2aXMVVjE621A0IAbNHp9IDdTCc2/ymELq EPKfRfEI6vwNjcDL0/72pbOhTpWWPv0D2We2IuSV8En7RBMUQK57X8ZG+XY7YEp8U1 cdZwKL3rLoI8euNyPPw6bITZQBDYNTGUW6rMdsbAFcp94IeGZvKvkyU3j/bI/OT7pZ 0evYbRVsI00MtictJpn/qLofVAYigAFymh6WrOisW0e5mHzc0Bi4EUv8dzFDbRPLoy J5xbrKMorcy9XQPFt4ZSJjBUjFJMugBK/QMUvfu88XAOMgQgjlf29xTLu9TfMTLYfH 7ieEQ6DSQwILw== Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 16:45:57 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Kai-Heng Feng Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, koba.ko@canonical.com, Oliver O'Halloran , mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI/AER: Disable AER service on suspend when IRQ is shared with PME Message-ID: <20220928214557.GA1840266@bhelgaas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220727013255.269815-2-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 09:32:51AM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > PCIe service that shares IRQ with PME may cause spurious wakeup on > system suspend. > > PCIe Base Spec 5.0, section 5.2 "Link State Power Management" states > that TLP and DLLP transmission is disabled for a Link in L2/L3 Ready > (D3hot), L2 (D3cold with aux power) and L3 (D3cold), so we don't lose > much here to disable AER during system suspend. > > This is very similar to previous attempts to suspend AER and DPC [1], > but with a different reason. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20220408153159.106741-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com/ > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216295 > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng > --- > drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c > index 7952e5efd6cf3..60cc373754af2 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c > @@ -1372,6 +1372,26 @@ static int aer_probe(struct pcie_device *dev) > return 0; > } > > +static int aer_suspend(struct pcie_device *dev) > +{ > + struct aer_rpc *rpc = get_service_data(dev); > + > + if (dev->shared_pme_irq) > + aer_disable_rootport(rpc); aer_disable_rootport() seems like it might be overkill. IIUC, what we want to do here is disable AER interrupts, which should only require clearing ROOT_PORT_INTR_ON_MESG_MASK in PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND. In addition to clearing ROOT_PORT_INTR_ON_MESG_MASK, aer_disable_rootport() traverses the whole hierarchy, clearing PCI_EXP_AER_FLAGS (CERE | NFERE | FERE | URRE) in PCI_EXP_DEVCTL. I don't think these DEVCTL bits control interrupt generation, so I don't know why we need to touch them. aer_disable_rootport() also clears PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS, which I think we should not do during suspend either. We might want to clear it on resume (which we already do in pci_restore_state()), but I think generally we should preserve error information as long as it doesn't cause trouble. Your thoughts please :) > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int aer_resume(struct pcie_device *dev) > +{ > + struct aer_rpc *rpc = get_service_data(dev); > + > + if (dev->shared_pme_irq) > + aer_enable_rootport(rpc); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > /** > * aer_root_reset - reset Root Port hierarchy, RCEC, or RCiEP > * @dev: pointer to Root Port, RCEC, or RCiEP > @@ -1441,8 +1461,9 @@ static struct pcie_port_service_driver aerdriver = { > .name = "aer", > .port_type = PCIE_ANY_PORT, > .service = PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_AER, > - > .probe = aer_probe, > + .suspend = aer_suspend, > + .resume = aer_resume, > .remove = aer_remove, > }; > > -- > 2.36.1 >