Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Khalid Masum <khalid.masum.92@gmail.com>
To:     Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
        David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Khalid Masum <khalid.masum.92@gmail.com>,
        Sadiya Kazi <sadiyakazi@google.com>,
        Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] Documentation: Kunit: Use full path to .kunitconfig
Date:   Thu, 29 Sep 2022 14:53:32 +0600
Message-Id: <20220929085332.4155-1-khalid.masum.92@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

The fourth list item on writing test cases instructs adding Kconfig
fragments to .kunitconfig, which should have been full path to the file
(.kunit/.kunitconfig).

Cc: Sadiya Kazi <sadiyakazi@google.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Suggested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Khalid Masum <khalid.masum.92@gmail.com>
---
Changes since v1:
- Update commit message
- Make the instruction more descriptive

 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
index 867a4bba6bf6..69361065cda6 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ Now we are ready to write the test cases.
 
 	obj-$(CONFIG_MISC_EXAMPLE_TEST) += example_test.o
 
-4. Add the following lines to ``.kunitconfig``:
+4. Add following configuration fragments to ``.kunit/.kunitconfig``:
 
 .. code-block:: none
 
-- 
2.37.3