Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <3bddff5a-78ed-a3fa-841c-2f2f6a8f8bbb@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 29 Sep 2022 10:39:26 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/91.0 Thunderbird/91.11.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: sof_rt5682: remove
 SOF_RT1015_SPEAKER_AMP_100FS flag
Content-Language: en-US
To:     "Lu, Brent" <brent.lu@intel.com>,
        "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
Cc:     "Rojewski, Cezary" <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>,
        Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>,
        Ajye Huang <ajye.huang@gmail.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
        Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>,
        "Chiang, Mac" <mac.chiang@intel.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>,
        "Gopal, Vamshi Krishna" <vamshi.krishna.gopal@intel.com>,
        "Zhi, Yong" <yong.zhi@intel.com>
References: <20220913074906.926774-1-brent.lu@intel.com>
 <2577e4db-8593-cf37-135b-aa51b6268cd7@linux.intel.com>
 <CY5PR11MB6257A5CC3976FAEA2C713A4997559@CY5PR11MB6257.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
 <d94a9abd-95ca-09ba-ab24-e4c38b832678@linux.intel.com>
 <CY5PR11MB6257AF53395DDF069A43D28E97579@CY5PR11MB6257.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From:   Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <CY5PR11MB6257AF53395DDF069A43D28E97579@CY5PR11MB6257.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 9/29/22 08:25, Lu, Brent wrote:
>>>
>>> I think TDM slot number is possible but not TX/RX mask. What we have
>>> in topology is union of tx/rx mask of all channels. We don't know the
>>> mask of specific channel in DAI_CONFIG.
>>>
>>> DAI_CONFIG(SSP, 0, BOARD_HP_BE_ID, SSP0-Codec,
>>>         SSP_CONFIG(I2S, SSP_CLOCK(mclk, 19200000, codec_mclk_in),
>>>                 SSP_CLOCK(bclk, 2400000, codec_slave),
>>>                 SSP_CLOCK(fsync, 48000, codec_slave),
>>>                 SSP_TDM(2, 25, 3, 3),
>>
>> the 3 3 is precisely the channel mask!
>>
> 
> Yes, but what we need in the hw_params() is the mask for individual channel,
> like 0x1 for left and 0x2 for right.

Ah yes, you're talking about the mask configuration on the codec side,
sorry I was confused with your reference to DAI_CONFIG. That would be
platform-level information, not DSP topology information indeed.

Sounds good then, thanks for the explanations.

Acked-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>