Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760107AbXFWOmt (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jun 2007 10:42:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756800AbXFWOmm (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jun 2007 10:42:42 -0400 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:44442 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755521AbXFWOml (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jun 2007 10:42:41 -0400 Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 15:48:03 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: Andi Kleen Cc: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz , Oleg Verych , Randy Dunlap , lkml , akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: NAK (bashizm in the /bin/sh script): [PATCH v3] doc/oops-tracing: add Code: decode info Message-ID: <20070623154803.3c621705@the-village.bc.nu> In-Reply-To: <200706231634.42907.ak@suse.de> References: <20070621225108.bb69a93d.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <200706231517.28085.ak@suse.de> <20070623153239.78ee86fe@the-village.bc.nu> <200706231634.42907.ak@suse.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.8; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Organization: Red Hat UK Cyf., Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, Y Deyrnas Gyfunol. Cofrestrwyd yng Nghymru a Lloegr o'r rhif cofrestru 3798903 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1311 Lines: 31 On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 16:34:42 +0200 Andi Kleen wrote: > On Saturday 23 June 2007 16:32:39 Alan Cox wrote: > > > Having the scripts work with other shells is very helpful for porting, > > cross building and the like. > > Well then for the majority of cross compile users you should consequently write > them in Windows batch language. That isn't portable or standardised. And there are posix shells for Windows if you really want to cross build on Windows (and some folks do for embedded because of debug/ice enviroments - pity them) > > Also on Linux /bin/sh is not > > neccessarily /bin/bash. > > If it's not I think these few distributions give Linux a bad name > because they introduce quite unnecessary incompatibilities. > Hopefully they are not widely used. On the contrary, it is you who is causing incompatibilities by objecting to the use of standards compliant behaviour. This is the world according to the standards not the world according to Andi Kleen. (Which one would run better is a different debate to which one we live in ;)) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/