Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220924152227.819815-1-atomlin@redhat.com> <20220924152227.819815-5-atomlin@redhat.com>
 <CAOr2xH5DjEy7agHYx=5+4cr+OeJz52HUeUttkF9ueS8JHbQMFg@mail.gmail.com> <20220929082216.vbkyzbxhsq2ixjdm@ava.usersys.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220929082216.vbkyzbxhsq2ixjdm@ava.usersys.com>
From:   Rafael Folco <rfolco@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 29 Sep 2022 09:49:33 -0300
Message-ID: <CAOr2xH7mitckRF8_8wE9aDZuG2M2YCAH0-NUweY3Z6Bt3KwNqA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/5] tick/nohz_full: Ensure quiet_vmstat() is called on
 exit to user-mode when the idle tick is stopped
To:     Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com>
Cc:     frederic@kernel.org, mtosatti@redhat.com, cl@linux.com,
        tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
        pauld@redhat.com, neelx@redhat.com, oleksandr@natalenko.name,
        atomlin@atomlin.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Yes, please do. Thanks!

On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 5:22 AM Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue 2022-09-27 13:17 -0300, Rafael Folco wrote:
> > Tested this patch w/ nohz_full setup and oslat 8h run on isolated cpus, max
> > latency is 7us versus 15us without the patch.
> > Thanks.
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
> Good news. Thanks for the feedback.
> May I add Tested-by: ?
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> --
> Aaron Tomlin
>


-- 
Folco