Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <dacfc18d6667421d97127451eafe4f29@AcuMS.aculab.com>
 <CAHk-=wgS_XpzEL140ovgLwGv6yXvV7Pu9nKJbCuo5pnRfcEbvg@mail.gmail.com>
 <YzXo/DIwq65ypHNH@ZenIV> <YzXrOFpPStEwZH/O@ZenIV> <CAHk-=wjLgM06JrS21W4g2VquqCLab+qu_My67cv6xuH7NhgHpw@mail.gmail.com>
 <YzXzXNAgcJeJ3M0d@ZenIV> <YzYK7k3tgZy3Pwht@ZenIV>
In-Reply-To: <YzYK7k3tgZy3Pwht@ZenIV>
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 29 Sep 2022 14:29:03 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wihPFFE5KcsmOnOm1CALQDWqC1JTvrwSGBS08N5avVmEA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] proc: Point /proc/net at /proc/thread-self/net
 instead of /proc/self/net
To:     Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 2:15 PM Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> FWIW, what e.g. debian profile for dhclient has is
>   @{PROC}/@{pid}/net/dev      r,
>
> Note that it's not
>   @{PROC}/net/dev      r,

Argh. Yeah, then a bind mount or a hardlink won't work either, you're
right. I was assuming that any Apparmor rules allowed for just
/proc/net.

Oh well. I guess we're screwed any which way we turn.

           Linus