Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 29 Sep 2022 18:35:45 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To:     "Junichi Uekawa (=?UTF-8?B?5LiK5bed57SU5LiA?=) " 
        <uekawa@chromium.org>
Cc:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
        Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, davem@davemloft.net,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost/vsock: Use kvmalloc/kvfree for larger packets.
Message-ID: <20220929183545.6ff5048a@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CADgJSGGNjsnmzVdHkhqDN+_1cJxcPYe-U=a4A4TAL8PA6=owCw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20220928064538.667678-1-uekawa@chromium.org>
        <20220928082823.wyxplop5wtpuurwo@sgarzare-redhat>
        <20220928052738-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
        <20220928151135.pvrlsylg6j3hzh74@sgarzare-redhat>
        <CADgJSGHxPWXJjbakEeWnqF42A03yK7Dpw6U1SKNLhk+B248Ymg@mail.gmail.com>
        <20220929031419-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
        <20220929074606.yqzihpcc7cl442c5@sgarzare-redhat>
        <20220929034807-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
        <20220929090731.27cda58c@kernel.org>
        <20220929122444-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
        <20220929110740.77942060@kernel.org>
        <CADgJSGGNjsnmzVdHkhqDN+_1cJxcPYe-U=a4A4TAL8PA6=owCw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 09:49:54 +0900 Junichi Uekawa (=E4=B8=8A=E5=B7=9D=E7=B4=
=94=E4=B8=80) wrote:
> > > I think they want it in 6.0 as it fixes a crash. =20
> >
> > I thought it's just an OOM leading to send failure. Junichi could you
> > repost with the tags collected and the header for that stack trace
> > included? The line that says it's just an OOM...
> > =20
>=20
> I think this is what you asked for but I don't quite know what you
> mean by the tags

We call Reviewed-by: Acked-by: Fixes: etc trailers "tags".
Don't worry tho, you shared the full stack trace now, I'll
fix the message up when applying.