Received: by 2002:a05:6359:c8b:b0:c7:702f:21d4 with SMTP id go11csp3258454rwb; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 00:30:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6397rvVERen/spR7uHiLdTDTF9H952x25fTEIs3xhGvlbXeRwyQAtNoQsALnI1Mugsq58S X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:6ea4:b0:782:b261:e9ec with SMTP id sh36-20020a1709076ea400b00782b261e9ecmr5627682ejc.287.1664523009153; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 00:30:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1664523009; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=p4du+AnM08GnM9BLj/MFE8nXO9VyfAXQp1NdDjlH386u7Eq8Z2Cgw3H1kZaujz7z+2 kfvV9G5UUFJ8ww2UDRKpRQnzPH1ImyMQHEe4GVHmJ5Mz8RgzRhenxSqwI1AWAkFasLgo vvcVJD9bHN16kKPbsbEBZt1Y+qoVd8uPkMtTopAYUUk+NzqFpUKFfXgJQJOADQvu6Eew kuEYmsO2zvGp4+/PEUI/EKq2vIk0H1nC6jY2+gYeTFuWa4VsBbZ76fAEN8hJxpOTk6da EaXdAHwK2NN3/VNABjmg/81EDY/83akDcTK5ir/bwQgvoo+MIMZqqujJKc9gwvwMzRGP 1V/A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=IZhgBaNpnN52QA/RAYf1uPe6zc9K2Ym7WyVDYOhPLv0=; b=GV+5pGup62EEOawBob4sMF0S/2SD6GNWhoIuhEYmUJwAJmavbJhyvI+Qj+C5YDpKA/ CyBM2EWkNFovlsdY6IAFqRtaRd7omj6uHruL7FdayrrfGxYGPq8yloSvOt0/HR/DJrS5 ZgpJKBQ//bi98OSNKtzSTSkcdqKn/kI9yvbe0pX5swhSWglXIVb1L70O/PbEUsNpPLFF YWa+SEC2mYvP3rMIj0PHuUeWJzPSAjKBoIww5Hbjj2mGwMzw0XrCB32kv0hv1sjc7zlB irosDstR1m60ksMMGZSvrnaSgy0eBYqBWcago11+t71XnrKzy2LW2bv9RwFPQSD74S9C qxWA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@microchip.com header.s=mchp header.b="M5BZuE/Q"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=microchip.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b8-20020a056402084800b00456f2b66376si1707480edz.448.2022.09.30.00.29.43; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 00:30:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@microchip.com header.s=mchp header.b="M5BZuE/Q"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=microchip.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231152AbiI3HPs (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 30 Sep 2022 03:15:48 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60870 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231156AbiI3HPp (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Sep 2022 03:15:45 -0400 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com (esa.microchip.iphmx.com [68.232.153.233]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F299213746A; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 00:15:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1664522142; x=1696058142; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=nBnk2H1ZFAJdL54aE/crKqQH3+vyJO5hi81g9RggVEU=; b=M5BZuE/QpIIMZCYTu3wbbjoR3Tkfpl7VoKeTqrZ3cY2r4GhrWBfxnPvT Wt1Uv/1WRH+9q4Filmc8uiPnULgVm9eVRDWgB4KjnCCQ1a2ioKGgmH66T oWjRvYBFIOWD8jQF1L5gs/EgE50216xh6fB3C4mNMMEnmoxFXm81Vg0ph 8xKLc2Y9bBncifOl8oRl6jZssFRyNo+RRnjDu8EBO7s+oHwOSx44bR/Il DFC0kMc3dfq/bHziFl+Ck2Itq6laXy57ZImpgZQvpO0A94h/3QFiG6dBf x7zas0nFrSp8A4Mc99Gy6Kbw92Fj9UknPA5n8lTrlcMXNTbZkF91m2621 w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,357,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="182751300" Received: from unknown (HELO email.microchip.com) ([170.129.1.10]) by esa3.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 30 Sep 2022 00:15:41 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) by chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.12; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 00:15:39 -0700 Received: from localhost (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.2507.12 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 00:15:39 -0700 Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 09:20:08 +0200 From: Horatiu Vultur To: Nathan Huckleberry CC: Dan Carpenter , , , "David S. Miller" , "Eric Dumazet" , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Tom Rix , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: lan966x: Fix return type of lan966x_port_xmit Message-ID: <20220930072008.jhu2wj7tqpa3nfud@soft-dev3-1.localhost> References: <20220929182704.64438-1-nhuck@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220929182704.64438-1-nhuck@google.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The 09/29/2022 11:27, Nathan Huckleberry wrote: Hi Nathan, > > The ndo_start_xmit field in net_device_ops is expected to be of type > netdev_tx_t (*ndo_start_xmit)(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev). > > The mismatched return type breaks forward edge kCFI since the underlying > function definition does not match the function hook definition. > > The return type of lan966x_port_xmit should be changed from int to > netdev_tx_t. > > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1703 > Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev > Signed-off-by: Nathan Huckleberry It looks pretty good. If we change the return type of lan966x_port_xmit, can we change also the return type of the functions lan966x_fdma_xmit and lan966x_port_ifh_xmit? And then also make sure to return NETDEV_TX_BUSY in case lan966x_ptp_txtstamp_request fails and not the error code? I have a diff below: --- diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_fdma.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_fdma.c index 7e4061c854f0e..148920bb74e08 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_fdma.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_fdma.c @@ -558,7 +558,8 @@ static int lan966x_fdma_get_next_dcb(struct lan966x_tx *tx) return -1; } -int lan966x_fdma_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 *ifh, struct net_device *dev) +netdev_tx_t lan966x_fdma_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 *ifh, + struct net_device *dev) { struct lan966x_port *port = netdev_priv(dev); struct lan966x *lan966x = port->lan966x; diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c index b98d37c76edbc..4b471a1562e29 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c @@ -219,9 +219,9 @@ static int lan966x_port_inj_ready(struct lan966x *lan966x, u8 grp) READL_SLEEP_US, READL_TIMEOUT_US); } -static int lan966x_port_ifh_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, - __be32 *ifh, - struct net_device *dev) +static netdev_tx_t lan966x_port_ifh_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, + __be32 *ifh, + struct net_device *dev) { struct lan966x_port *port = netdev_priv(dev); struct lan966x *lan966x = port->lan966x; @@ -344,12 +344,12 @@ static void lan966x_ifh_set_timestamp(void *ifh, u64 timestamp) IFH_POS_TIMESTAMP, IFH_LEN * 4, PACK, 0); } -static int lan966x_port_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) +static netdev_tx_t lan966x_port_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) { struct lan966x_port *port = netdev_priv(dev); struct lan966x *lan966x = port->lan966x; __be32 ifh[IFH_LEN]; - int err; + netdev_tx_t ret; memset(ifh, 0x0, sizeof(__be32) * IFH_LEN); @@ -360,9 +360,8 @@ static int lan966x_port_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) lan966x_ifh_set_vid(ifh, skb_vlan_tag_get(skb)); if (port->lan966x->ptp && skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP) { - err = lan966x_ptp_txtstamp_request(port, skb); - if (err) - return err; + if (lan966x_ptp_txtstamp_request(port, skb)) + return NETDEV_TX_BUSY; lan966x_ifh_set_rew_op(ifh, LAN966X_SKB_CB(skb)->rew_op); lan966x_ifh_set_timestamp(ifh, LAN966X_SKB_CB(skb)->ts_id); @@ -370,12 +369,12 @@ static int lan966x_port_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) spin_lock(&lan966x->tx_lock); if (port->lan966x->fdma) - err = lan966x_fdma_xmit(skb, ifh, dev); + ret = lan966x_fdma_xmit(skb, ifh, dev); else - err = lan966x_port_ifh_xmit(skb, ifh, dev); + ret = lan966x_port_ifh_xmit(skb, ifh, dev); spin_unlock(&lan966x->tx_lock); - return err; + return ret; } static int lan966x_port_change_mtu(struct net_device *dev, int new_mtu) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.h index 9656071b8289e..d61a0fc4b33ab 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.h +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.h @@ -434,7 +434,8 @@ irqreturn_t lan966x_ptp_ext_irq_handler(int irq, void *args); u32 lan966x_ptp_get_period_ps(void); int lan966x_ptp_gettime64(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp, struct timespec64 *ts); -int lan966x_fdma_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 *ifh, struct net_device *dev); +netdev_tx_t lan966x_fdma_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 *ifh, + struct net_device *dev); int lan966x_fdma_change_mtu(struct lan966x *lan966x); void lan966x_fdma_netdev_init(struct lan966x *lan966x, struct net_device *dev); void lan966x_fdma_netdev_deinit(struct lan966x *lan966x, struct net_device *dev); --- > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c > index b98d37c76edb..be2fd030cccb 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c > @@ -344,7 +344,8 @@ static void lan966x_ifh_set_timestamp(void *ifh, u64 timestamp) > IFH_POS_TIMESTAMP, IFH_LEN * 4, PACK, 0); > } > > -static int lan966x_port_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) > +static netdev_tx_t lan966x_port_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, > + struct net_device *dev) > { > struct lan966x_port *port = netdev_priv(dev); > struct lan966x *lan966x = port->lan966x; > -- > 2.38.0.rc1.362.ged0d419d3c-goog > -- /Horatiu