Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Brent Lu <brent.lu@intel.com>
Cc:     Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
        Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>,
        Ajye Huang <ajye.huang@gmail.com>,
        Vamshi Krishna <vamshi.krishna.gopal@intel.com>,
        Mac Chiang <mac.chiang@intel.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>,
        Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
        Yong Zhi <yong.zhi@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220913074906.926774-1-brent.lu@intel.com>
References: <20220913074906.926774-1-brent.lu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: sof_rt5682: remove SOF_RT1015_SPEAKER_AMP_100FS flag
Message-Id: <166453086469.89101.17355339743373464176.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 30 Sep 2022 10:41:04 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 13 Sep 2022 15:49:06 +0800, Brent Lu wrote:
> This flag could be removed since we now have API to query bclk
> fequency setting in the topology. The dai link structure itself also
> provides DAI format information instead of figuring it out with fs
> number.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: Intel: sof_rt5682: remove SOF_RT1015_SPEAKER_AMP_100FS flag
      commit: 4157155df7d34bd91879c06a787944529f0d9a0d

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark