Received: by 2002:a05:6359:c8b:b0:c7:702f:21d4 with SMTP id go11csp3783545rwb; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 08:15:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6w5TOcInYMnslA1N9XMb2L5ghP3VjMrDcrCFi/bmo70+HSraYhQFECp59OFjjyvwIzqKCd X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:58cb:b0:787:8485:8555 with SMTP id e11-20020a17090658cb00b0078784858555mr6751792ejs.252.1664550947001; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 08:15:47 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1664550946; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=x3XiND09CW10RNFg+JZoLqDdMtyQDKlNZYE9msdOSzaD8yTJ1PYJYZLLq2oPGLGmrK wPqVWZCSAvPsnxYMbSwlF7Gnq2xD0NnBfR/nENJmjArgiyH80rY5petMei6z283Vipxz DmDqo7s/MdzXTpn6Kr3NOCsqM7uvjjBaAFix7YOGT5ok2MPUpZdOMgBlEKNfEJq1mEx0 /wfcFFEpApWg3ug0L4FwOEeSKjN5uPETjbxjS7xtlxjTZNO5wr6PVyVJSgGA0ePozq5O ogjf0EyN1Ycnr7EupaB2M+07tritn++KoamPPTrdSiCQkLaDhSMJYiw5P2lfEpdFdqUF mqfg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:user-agent :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date:mime-version; bh=RE6j14FZmC70ZSj+X4HL6L8PGHBAC/LiKU19rwPhT/8=; b=CiNeg+OzIq8IrDKgEVYsxI2jw33Is5cjzLUo7Ee+rqOFgbQvAwwRpBPoynsXLXq5qw 5h8pZYZMsrCykDDQKhTH/MAQFyCmvDvLvGp351UF1uvIuphiSVFw5WnTwi+jDS48xT3m wH180BofHs5QBTuh5sbGj4CWmdOg805ZEfivy/kJt4euP0BODsbYc4WbSeAWAVGrbEYQ A5Syf04gmXOAg33HrKn3PNtqgsofULs0uzIHJrw5UaQLGgsD8eF1oPj9SRdu3KaCht5k mLnZOmnHyIdvTk6On+29LgdjHHtTFnZSrtk8ttWi0KyJfF6y+bH54I8KyRrKCTI34ZbJ pksg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hs27-20020a1709073e9b00b007826cb6f57csi1832364ejc.407.2022.09.30.08.15.21; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 08:15:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231921AbiI3PBp (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 30 Sep 2022 11:01:45 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34390 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231473AbiI3PA7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Sep 2022 11:00:59 -0400 Received: from mailout-taastrup.gigahost.dk (mailout-taastrup.gigahost.dk [46.183.139.199]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8CB81C2970; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 07:59:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout.gigahost.dk (mailout.gigahost.dk [89.186.169.112]) by mailout-taastrup.gigahost.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1745C1884494; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 14:59:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gigahost.dk (smtp.gigahost.dk [89.186.169.109]) by mailout.gigahost.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 028A62500015; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 14:59:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.gigahost.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F0E8B9EC0007; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 14:59:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Screener-Id: 413d8c6ce5bf6eab4824d0abaab02863e8e3f662 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 16:59:13 +0200 From: netdev@kapio-technology.com To: Ido Schimmel Cc: Jakub Kicinski , davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Florian Fainelli , Andrew Lunn , Vivien Didelot , Vladimir Oltean , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Kurt Kanzenbach , Hauke Mehrtens , Woojung Huh , UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Sean Wang , Landen Chao , DENG Qingfang , Matthias Brugger , Claudiu Manoil , Alexandre Belloni , Jiri Pirko , Ivan Vecera , Roopa Prabhu , Nikolay Aleksandrov , Shuah Khan , Russell King , Christian Marangi , Daniel Borkmann , Yuwei Wang , Petr Machata , Florent Fourcot , Hans Schultz , Joachim Wiberg , Amit Cohen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 0/9] Extend locked port feature with FDB locked flag (MAC-Auth/MAB) In-Reply-To: References: <20220928150256.115248-1-netdev@kapio-technology.com> <20220929091036.3812327f@kernel.org> <12587604af1ed79be4d3a1607987483a@kapio-technology.com> <20220929112744.27cc969b@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gigahost Webmail Message-ID: <16d6db15df0a875e442456ff56234b98@kapio-technology.com> X-Sender: netdev@kapio-technology.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2022-09-30 16:05, Ido Schimmel wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 07:42:37AM +0200, netdev@kapio-technology.com > wrote: >> Obviously my method of selecting all switchcore drivers with >> sub-options >> under menuconfig was not sufficient, and I didn't know of the >> allmodconfig >> option, otherwise I would have used it. > > You can see build issues on patchwork: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20220928150256.115248-6-netdev@kapio-technology.com/ > > Also: > > https://docs.kernel.org/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#what-level-of-testing-is-expected-before-i-submit-my-change > > https://docs.kernel.org/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#can-i-reproduce-the-checks-from-patchwork-on-my-local-machine > > https://docs.kernel.org/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#running-all-the-builds-and-checks-locally-is-a-pain-can-i-post-my-patches-and-have-the-patchwork-bot-validate-them > >> So the question is if I should repost the fixed patch-set or I need to >> make >> a new version? > > A new fixed version (v7) is required, but wait for this version to be > reviewed first. > >> Anyhow I hope that there will not be problems when running the >> selftests, as >> I have not been able to do so with my system, so there can be more >> that >> needs to be changed. > > It's not really acceptable to post tests that you haven't run... What > exactly is the issue? You should be able to run the tests with veth > pairs in a VM. It is only the blackhole test that I have not been able to run as is, but I have stepped it manually as far as I could. My environment has changed lately and in that context the building of the selftests fails and I don't know why,I just get some error messagesabout missing header files, and setting up a whole system like f.ex. linuxfromscratch with the necessary libs and tools to run it in a VM is too time consuming a task at the moment. If there is some freely available system for the purpose out there besides my own system based on Buildroot that does not work now, please let me know...