Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220929161917.2348231-1-rrangel@chromium.org>
 <20220929093200.v6.6.I8092e417a8152475d13d8d638eb4c5d8ea12ac7b@changeid>
 <CAJZ5v0izHjb8vE0ALyYo9yMOExdpCzG8f7-d5SpQnftqJfTEig@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHQZ30CJyhPK-OriZ5NZ=GjwNbofaCW6GZ_CvPsL0WiJGsxs-Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJZ5v0gcJRoMSODbTevRdK1zaEZHJcPxvG6XMy9-T_jvwxPFBw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHQZ30CQd-0YnQgYG_OJVWn9_aUjvDAuT_DRGsxQF-q+bjr5BA@mail.gmail.com> <YzYowYJpRTImmg4m@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <YzYowYJpRTImmg4m@google.com>
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 30 Sep 2022 19:13:37 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0i+QYcMuqsK9y6qy9qzJdUp503Sidr1e4V_ROyumLKCsw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 06/13] ACPI: resources: Add wake_capable parameter to acpi_dev_irq_flags
To:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
        Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-input <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
        Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
        Tim Van Patten <timvp@google.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        "jingle.wu" <jingle.wu@emc.com.tw>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
        Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>, Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        llvm@lists.linux.dev
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 1:22 AM Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 03:20:12PM -0600, Raul Rangel wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 1:38 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 9:27 PM Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 1:18 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 6:19 PM Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ACPI IRQ/Interrupt resources contain a bit that describes if the
> > > > > > interrupt should wake the system. This change exposes that bit via
> > > > > > a new IORESOURCE_IRQ_WAKECAPABLE flag. Drivers should check this flag
> > > > >
> > > > > I would call this IORESOURCE_IRQ_WAKE which is (a) simpler and easier
> > > > > to read and (b) it sort of matches the "wakeirq" naming convention.
> > > >
> > > > It was Dmitry who originally suggested the name. I personally like the
> > > > CAPABLE in the name. It makes it clear that it's capable of acting as
> > > > a wake source, not to be confused with being enabled as a wake source.
> > >
> > > Well, so be it then.
> > >
> > > As I said elsewhere, I can apply this patch too if that's useful at this point.
> > >
> >
> > We just need to make sure the ACPI patches 5-8 land before the i2c
> > patches 9-13. The i2c patches 1-4 can land before or after the ACPI
> > changes. I'm not sure how things get coordinated across subsystems.
>
> I am fine with all input stuff going through ACPI tree to ease landing.
> Or I can pick up everything if Rafael and Jiri/Benjamin agree.

I think that patches [5-8/13] from this series are significant
framework changes, so it would make sense to route them via the ACPI
tree.

If this is fine with everybody, I will queue them up for merging into
6.1 (probably in the second half of the upcoming merge window).