Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756501AbXFXSUL (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Jun 2007 14:20:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751423AbXFXSUA (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Jun 2007 14:20:00 -0400 Received: from mail-in-04.arcor-online.net ([151.189.21.44]:44224 "EHLO mail-in-04.arcor-online.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751269AbXFXST7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Jun 2007 14:19:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070624174732.GZ21478@ftp.linux.org.uk> References: <20070624174732.GZ21478@ftp.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 20:18:52 +0200 To: Al Viro X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.623) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1421 Lines: 47 >> Hopefully correct handling of integer constant expressions. Please, >> review. > > Heh... The first catches are lovely: > struct fxsrAlignAssert { > int _:!(offsetof(struct task_struct, > thread.i387.fxsave) & 15); > }; That's... wow? > #define _IOC_TYPECHECK(t) \ > ((sizeof(t) == sizeof(t[1]) && \ > sizeof(t) < (1 << _IOC_SIZEBITS)) ? \ > sizeof(t) : __invalid_size_argument_for_IOC) > poisoning _IOW() et.al., so those who do something like > > static const char *v4l1_ioctls[] = { > [_IOC_NR(VIDIOCGCAP)] = "VIDIOCGCAP", > > run into trouble. > The only reason that doesn't break gcc to hell and back is > that gcc has unfixed bugs in that area. If I understand correctly what bugs you are talking about, most (all?) of those were solved in the dark ages already (i.e., the 3.x series). > It certainly is not a valid C Why not? Nothing in the C standard says all your externs have to be defined in some other translation unit you link with AFAIK. > or even a remotely sane one. It's unusual at least :-) Segher - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/