Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 30 Sep 2022 13:22:25 -0700
From:   Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To:     Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>
Cc:     pmladek@suse.com, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] module: Correct wake up of module_wq
Message-ID: <YzdQAWa5eRtfOwHl@bombadil.infradead.org>
References: <20220919123233.8538-1-petr.pavlu@suse.com>
 <20220919123233.8538-2-petr.pavlu@suse.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220919123233.8538-2-petr.pavlu@suse.com>
Sender: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@infradead.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 02:32:32PM +0200, Petr Pavlu wrote:
> The module_wq wait queue has only non-exclusive waiters and all waits
> are interruptible, therefore for consistency use wake_up_interruptible()
> to wake its waiters.
> 
> Suggested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>

Does this fix a bug? It seems like it does. Please think of this should
go to stable, for instance, does it fix a bug not yet reported?

  Luis