Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752694AbXFXV3t (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Jun 2007 17:29:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752079AbXFXV3Z (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Jun 2007 17:29:25 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:37133 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754083AbXFXV3V (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Jun 2007 17:29:21 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Chuck Ebbert Subject: Re: Please release a stable kernel Linux 3.0 Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 22:54:59 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: Jesper Juhl , =?iso-8859-1?q?Zolt=E1n_HUBERT?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200706212349.54983.zoltan.hubert@zzaero.com> <200706221700.08135.rjw@sisk.pl> <467C02AA.2080105@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <467C02AA.2080105@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706242254.59695.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1515 Lines: 38 On Friday, 22 June 2007 19:11, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > On 06/22/2007 11:00 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, 22 June 2007 00:34, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > >> On 06/21/2007 06:29 PM, Jesper Juhl wrote: > >>> I myself have argued that we should be focusing more on stability and > >>> regression fixing, but I'm not so sure that a 2.6.7 devel branch would > >>> solve this. In general the 2.6.x.y -stable kernels seem to be doing > >>> the job pretty good. > >>> > >> > >> Even the good ones that get lots of fixes aren't all that good. The > >> biggest problem ATM is that suspend is badly broken and keeps getting > >> worse... > > > > Can you please provide me with any links to suspend-related bug reports from > > you? > > > > I get so many suspend/resume bug reports that I've given up trying > to get them fixed. And there are so many bugs that are even worse, > like crashes during normal use, data corruption, etc. that suspend > bugs don't get much attention. But here are the ones for Fedora 6; > the list would be much longer if I included Fedora 5 and 7: Can you please tell me what's the relationship between Fedora kernel vesions and the kernel.org kernels? Greetings, Rafael -- "Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/