Received: by 2002:a05:6359:c8b:b0:c7:702f:21d4 with SMTP id go11csp2195724rwb; Sun, 2 Oct 2022 17:51:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6C4c+/d8+2E02cusQ8uL1Y5XUkku/AtYYo0Gpkg3jkHM5UEQkAIgCyYsulTaEh+Da+hwuh X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3b8e:b0:209:1e71:147e with SMTP id pc14-20020a17090b3b8e00b002091e71147emr9325527pjb.92.1664758279917; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 17:51:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1664758279; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SQHZlBujaRmsh37f7r0nEkWbKpNBHCAhyuK7vs8EXdBYBk/9G4i3yiB2/WVmgGd26J FnZPKAUL/FYz9aX8jxU3FFxb+9emtWIR99W/cdndRcsyWM2ASFskFlA4JKuM9q2nKHK4 BZJwzvl+84FigWcgtw/jPLVHmWDA5piqXg2ELKGEE+uMa2vFZODusQWo2LH0SFhhNIKe BJxUQy4VUgqDqdAwjmMbSIPjGM+AtLspyyiRMcRwbQdNrsE7RmUuiOihmzpXmCdvQ17w Ii2EhERbbXAq+dAArWp2yQlj7oaSUMtMZ1d/4vFfeH0iXEsYk9RoNwLhiYYKxyny3iFW bS4A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=SiSVZuB1v912OYrLJUOnkL7IcrGud9a1vbPHRorMLIk=; b=wRrXqZPSafLD4zPnS3vNnHuhCd4+NtqgXs4CetUZ78vJeAEoqMSo/VCY0eJy9/Dyhy i0FnvI81HkZHSBudYg4rqID3IoA3CmlImhPQsnXo/YJ0oiOdMuPIxxBwxftvqYYx3k7r YxwL/O09NvUT8F3ug+gQsTVJEidYzyu3JN1GI18hNgohaESexHcdI4DmM6RDa14fYxch uMvXaSfeEfHCKMsc0NA4eCWic18VUXSQUtl07oSEu/xWp44hMOgOlCvaPmCz8ASD58/5 oDjOrLg7ZKRm30sZPZ7umCCWcCY40yjhPZFhSvfkVQSBostexjkn3o4MxhRRmk2HaaEY nTeQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=Ue9K4UqR; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j15-20020a17090a840f00b001fe123e7d53si381977pjn.6.2022.10.02.17.51.02; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 17:51:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=Ue9K4UqR; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229521AbiJCAdX (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 2 Oct 2022 20:33:23 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44094 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229468AbiJCAdU (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Oct 2022 20:33:20 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-x841.google.com (mail-qt1-x841.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::841]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FFBB24BCD; Sun, 2 Oct 2022 17:33:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qt1-x841.google.com with SMTP id cj27so5622287qtb.7; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 17:33:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=SiSVZuB1v912OYrLJUOnkL7IcrGud9a1vbPHRorMLIk=; b=Ue9K4UqRqXMLIb+lFz6rF3yYe5OIlBdyN+cTlMaZzDrEeunHNqb9EUiqOQr8mEqovL on2h0ZNmtwzXY0VfWAUqwQeQ2Hs4nt2IDjBM2nVEpGyqhV1t+DZdgcf4vLcRmRgA/83V 2U/uVV6S4bYTy15TAYU+BNCxd6bq/Vz+7OPb5HzAF1yFTykYZKISQT6iAjtkTOPNAQCc BkbYFCj7EyXt1KbaP4QegBfiNb/rqqlkJHtLojHKkOcRifkbgB8vdO/i7HCR2osYxR/8 L8uNkzPbozeBbdOgTkD15sjnasoA45bQILCImGi+XaXhomg5vtdS0I7VsFjaLGNDZCYR uZSg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=SiSVZuB1v912OYrLJUOnkL7IcrGud9a1vbPHRorMLIk=; b=XqLufWMBnogUapI7m+W3dZ+VJ7Knz7ysB8DxCZLWRVcrzFvyMeJkcLz4klXqTrmA2p U56HEZg6YLJrKyShoedR4sKWNZdaxKxpz+FFvDZ9n4rAMq40Wuwlu3SGwkd7jvM8iCWz oVX2A5WO6irpzQLKQdEqmTz3fINMfAlERJAkUZYpgoe5lK1jrAJxG95+WokuznSPQF+e WvkhZXdbV5cX8eNSrNXkvcaAhZ6YwHlhdcxUnFrMhRtdU/SeMNDcPhHcNd6Vh9aRmz0S 8lAMSnc6RE2V03da4xUDElkaZ5Dm2YI68FtYeBkPcVdzHt/g9LmSubZ9d5HjsdSK3+53 aWyQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0WQCYYfiBtqyJ+8skUpyy9hGc4I4kNm9gzrXafQEcEpTotXYzQ +eEKnsOeE1U3xsdgI1nyYBvgk+LcLlPELFdMMeU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:2297:b0:35c:b809:cb2e with SMTP id ay23-20020a05622a229700b0035cb809cb2emr13915776qtb.193.1664757198613; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 17:33:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20221001144716.3403120-1-void@manifault.com> <20221001144716.3403120-3-void@manifault.com> In-Reply-To: <20221001144716.3403120-3-void@manifault.com> From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 02:32:41 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] bpf/selftests: Add selftests for new task kfuncs To: David Vernet Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, kernel-team@fb.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yhs@fb.com, song@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 1 Oct 2022 at 16:47, David Vernet wrote: > > A previous change added a series of kfuncs for storing struct > task_struct objects as referenced kptrs. This patch adds a new > task_kfunc test suite for validating their expected behavior. > > Signed-off-by: David Vernet > --- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x | 1 + > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_kfunc.c | 155 ++++++++++++ > .../selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_common.h | 83 +++++++ > .../selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c | 225 ++++++++++++++++++ > .../selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_success.c | 113 +++++++++ > 5 files changed, 577 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_kfunc.c > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_common.h > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_success.c > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x > index 17e074eb42b8..4c34818ec1ee 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x > @@ -75,3 +75,4 @@ user_ringbuf # failed to find kernel BTF type ID of > lookup_key # JIT does not support calling kernel function (kfunc) > verify_pkcs7_sig # JIT does not support calling kernel function (kfunc) > kfunc_dynptr_param # JIT does not support calling kernel function (kfunc) > +task_kfunc # JIT does not support calling kernel function > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_kfunc.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_kfunc.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..6c577fbca8f7 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_kfunc.c > @@ -0,0 +1,155 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +/* Copyright (c) 2022 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */ > + > +#define _GNU_SOURCE > +#include > +#include > +#include > + > +#include "task_kfunc_failure.skel.h" > +#include "task_kfunc_success.skel.h" > + > +static size_t log_buf_sz = 1 << 20; /* 1 MB */ > +static char obj_log_buf[1048576]; > + > +static struct task_kfunc_success *open_load_task_kfunc_skel(void) > +{ > + struct task_kfunc_success *skel; > + int err; > + > + skel = task_kfunc_success__open(); > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open")) > + return NULL; > + > + skel->bss->pid = getpid(); > + > + err = task_kfunc_success__load(skel); > + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "skel_load")) > + goto cleanup; > + > + return skel; > + > +cleanup: > + task_kfunc_success__destroy(skel); > + return NULL; > +} > + > +static void run_success_test(const char *prog_name) > +{ > + struct task_kfunc_success *skel; > + int status; > + pid_t child_pid; > + struct bpf_program *prog; > + struct bpf_link *link = NULL; > + > + skel = open_load_task_kfunc_skel(); > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "open_load_skel")) > + return; > + > + if (!ASSERT_OK(skel->bss->err, "pre_spawn_err")) > + goto cleanup; > + > + prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_name(skel->obj, prog_name); > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(prog, "bpf_object__find_program_by_name")) > + goto cleanup; > + > + link = bpf_program__attach(prog); > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attached_link")) > + goto cleanup; > + > + child_pid = fork(); > + if (!ASSERT_GT(child_pid, -1, "child_pid")) > + goto cleanup; > + if (child_pid == 0) > + _exit(0); > + waitpid(child_pid, &status, 0); > + > + ASSERT_OK(skel->bss->err, "post_wait_err"); > + > +cleanup: > + bpf_link__destroy(link); > + task_kfunc_success__destroy(skel); > +} > + > +static const char * const success_tests[] = { > + "test_task_acquire_release", > + "test_task_acquire_leave_in_map", > + "test_task_xchg_release", > + "test_task_get_release", > +}; > + > +static struct { > + const char *prog_name; > + const char *expected_err_msg; > +} failure_tests[] = { > + {"task_kfunc_acquire_untrusted", "arg#0 pointer type STRUCT task_struct must point"}, > + {"task_kfunc_acquire_null", "arg#0 pointer type STRUCT task_struct must point"}, > + {"task_kfunc_acquire_unreleased", "Unreleased reference"}, > + {"task_kfunc_get_non_kptr_param", "arg#0 expected pointer to map value"}, > + {"task_kfunc_get_non_kptr_acquired", "arg#0 expected pointer to map value"}, > + {"task_kfunc_get_null", "arg#0 expected pointer to map value"}, > + {"task_kfunc_xchg_unreleased", "Unreleased reference"}, > + {"task_kfunc_get_unreleased", "Unreleased reference"}, > + {"task_kfunc_release_untrusted", "arg#0 pointer type STRUCT task_struct must point"}, > + {"task_kfunc_release_null", "arg#0 pointer type STRUCT task_struct must point"}, > + {"task_kfunc_release_unacquired", "R1 must be referenced"}, > +}; > + > +static void verify_fail(const char *prog_name, const char *expected_err_msg) > +{ > + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts); > + struct task_kfunc_failure *skel; > + int err, i; > + > + opts.kernel_log_buf = obj_log_buf; > + opts.kernel_log_size = log_buf_sz; > + opts.kernel_log_level = 1; > + > + skel = task_kfunc_failure__open_opts(&opts); > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "task_kfunc_failure__open_opts")) > + goto cleanup; > + > + skel->bss->pid = getpid(); > + > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(failure_tests); i++) { > + struct bpf_program *prog; > + const char *curr_name = failure_tests[i].prog_name; > + > + prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_name(skel->obj, curr_name); > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(prog, "bpf_object__find_program_by_name")) > + goto cleanup; > + > + bpf_program__set_autoload(prog, !strcmp(curr_name, prog_name)); > + } > + > + err = task_kfunc_failure__load(skel); > + if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "unexpected load success")) > + goto cleanup; > + > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(strstr(obj_log_buf, expected_err_msg), "expected_err_msg")) { > + fprintf(stderr, "Expected err_msg: %s\n", expected_err_msg); > + fprintf(stderr, "Verifier output: %s\n", obj_log_buf); > + } > + > +cleanup: > + task_kfunc_failure__destroy(skel); > +} > + > +void test_task_kfunc(void) > +{ > + int i; > + > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(success_tests); i++) { > + if (!test__start_subtest(success_tests[i])) > + continue; > + > + run_success_test(success_tests[i]); > + } > + > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(failure_tests); i++) { > + if (!test__start_subtest(failure_tests[i].prog_name)) > + continue; > + > + verify_fail(failure_tests[i].prog_name, failure_tests[i].expected_err_msg); > + } > +} > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_common.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_common.h > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..bbb0a40572fd > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_common.h > @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ > +/* Copyright (c) 2022 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */ > + > +#ifndef _TASK_KFUNC_COMMON_H > +#define _TASK_KFUNC_COMMON_H > + > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > + > +struct __tasks_kfunc_map_value { > + struct task_struct __kptr_ref * task; > +}; > + > +struct hash_map { > + __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH); > + __type(key, int); > + __type(value, struct __tasks_kfunc_map_value); > + __uint(max_entries, 1); > +} __tasks_kfunc_map SEC(".maps"); > + > +struct task_struct *bpf_task_acquire(struct task_struct *p) __ksym; > +struct task_struct *bpf_task_kptr_get(struct task_struct **pp) __ksym; > +void bpf_task_release(struct task_struct *p) __ksym; > + > +#define TEST_NAME_SZ 128 > + > +/* The pid of the test process used to determine if a newly created task is the test task. */ > +int pid; > + > +static inline struct __tasks_kfunc_map_value *tasks_kfunc_map_value_lookup(struct task_struct *p) > +{ > + s32 pid; > + long status; > + > + status = bpf_probe_read_kernel(&pid, sizeof(pid), &p->pid); > + if (status) > + return NULL; > + > + return bpf_map_lookup_elem(&__tasks_kfunc_map, &pid); > +} > + > +static inline int tasks_kfunc_map_insert(struct task_struct *p) > +{ > + struct __tasks_kfunc_map_value local, *v; > + long status; > + struct task_struct *acquired, *old; > + s32 pid; > + > + status = bpf_probe_read_kernel(&pid, sizeof(pid), &p->pid); > + if (status) > + return status; > + > + local.task = NULL; > + status = bpf_map_update_elem(&__tasks_kfunc_map, &pid, &local, BPF_NOEXIST); > + if (status) > + return status; > + > + v = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&__tasks_kfunc_map, &pid); > + if (!v) { > + bpf_map_delete_elem(&__tasks_kfunc_map, &pid); > + return status; > + } > + > + acquired = bpf_task_acquire(p); > + old = bpf_kptr_xchg(&v->task, acquired); > + if (old) { > + bpf_task_release(old); > + return -EEXIST; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static inline bool is_test_kfunc_task(struct task_struct *task) > +{ > + int cur_pid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32; > + > + return pid == cur_pid; > +} > + > +#endif /* _TASK_KFUNC_COMMON_H */ > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..4cf01bbc8a16 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c > @@ -0,0 +1,225 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +/* Copyright (c) 2022 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */ > + > +#include > +#include > +#include > + > +#include "task_kfunc_common.h" > + > +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; > + > +/* Prototype for all of the program trace events below: > + * > + * TRACE_EVENT(task_newtask, > + * TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p, u64 clone_flags) > + */ > + > +SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask") > +int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_acquire_untrusted, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags) > +{ > + struct task_struct *acquired, *stack_ptr; > + > + if (!is_test_kfunc_task(task)) > + return 0; > + > + /* Can't invoke bpf_task_acquire() on an untrusted, random pointer. */ > + stack_ptr = (struct task_struct *)0xcafef00d; This seems like a misleading comment. 'stack_ptr' would just be a scalar, not a pointer. Maybe you should be testing this for an actual PTR_UNTRUSTED pointer instead. Load of a __kptr tagged pointer would be a good way. Very soon a lot of other pointers obtained from pointer walking are going to be marked PTR_UNTRUSTED, so then we would cover those as well similar to this test. Also, could you include a test to make sure sleepable programs cannot call bpf_task_acquire? It seems to assume RCU read lock is held while that may not be true. If already not possible, maybe a WARN_ON_ONCE inside the helper to ensure future cases don't creep in. > [...]