Received: by 2002:a05:6359:c8b:b0:c7:702f:21d4 with SMTP id go11csp2292297rwb; Sun, 2 Oct 2022 20:25:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6oLuM6IhLSrrHav7zmZLdTUlKnHEIK2bh37ovgZU9UW9A2kTkQDL1p51gNZ8OCTGa8/xM1 X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4f8d:b0:202:dd39:c03a with SMTP id qe13-20020a17090b4f8d00b00202dd39c03amr10181115pjb.71.1664767528057; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 20:25:28 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1664767528; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Gv0MnRquTDnL65MLvnzL3sBndkrhpj5Xjhjzo7iR4HuPaJgYHkCh+QyAMlGk2GboGu zQkAAV2D3dyWF5E+AWnaO2VqES4z1lyHlPVFFGw6G7JWftkz+MApFUsEKsQLL3rjP+7j PMo0H5RZc/Hg++EKHlOD8eyNLxSWJiXMYBXAhivWZnSOqLq5jClELUsldKaRUo6rZq5X XfUMKij5hBK7pmIBjqYs8a7cYTm1zq0WKNAHiT/3CU3Yh3e5IUOJHezUAjWwtqGiAq5q qw3qXJi+t5TVXOL0VqlPwTuKbJu7qe6/NDE3w6uJmVTXqIBxAq0Q/c2ZbO2FLa5kBBUd shDQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=W/iKlG/2SK1n0kxoLuiUZGSP3EqDCPf+GU5RrhiJsYQ=; b=PEM084c2pA8ynQNTA1EMtpBF9hQUNMYmuoqsojNuC7SMDygSXdqMMCQsQgb+RXOCm3 03UvltwTBsusdTDip0x0vGCsVeLKgY18aQmC/Kjt7r5b2qKzwV3whHWoU6uR9HNwVtBf fiF8QO18phLfxok1vfx+ex1V1rFqXengFdoSZfbRfswGE9lqRlVzolVTaONLY9Jd9nS1 289Jn0xpoFTX5zpuIwqZr1um+LHDBQ4My2KemYWCLWbpJyuNQYG/CQgPy9ijJPhiNPha t6/HPLYFHn8mwQ/yRtMGDxD0QabGM9qdfHZVcT8Y+hODAH3kNc/hMqW96gQTadcWqIyc CRjQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=BoARwX7N; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o8-20020a170902d4c800b0017c0d822437si1865902plg.82.2022.10.02.20.24.46; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 20:25:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=BoARwX7N; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229494AbiJCC70 (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 2 Oct 2022 22:59:26 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34852 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229469AbiJCC7Y (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Oct 2022 22:59:24 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x436.google.com (mail-pf1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::436]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C798236DFC for ; Sun, 2 Oct 2022 19:59:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x436.google.com with SMTP id w2so9100049pfb.0 for ; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 19:59:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=W/iKlG/2SK1n0kxoLuiUZGSP3EqDCPf+GU5RrhiJsYQ=; b=BoARwX7Nd8WClzBwMyYzJDLffZal0H7oFUVWCp88oQ4skclXYPWsAm5iF/RGz/MyXc cdtbif/cuPyeqc79/yPezCzvn1hD0z5ssXRL61Tz5g78eq+I1V3uKREZlYA0HSgpFWIF rHVcBz3wnyMTmYZ+AnhVwoG2YUpe0hFZmTVt0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=W/iKlG/2SK1n0kxoLuiUZGSP3EqDCPf+GU5RrhiJsYQ=; b=vf7L3yq4UMOtjQdYMUi8hC+ast3fbFDSdmHEC001LPaqkvZ2Jb2XkqYI1xgqwL6rIz T8X+04+jbLJaXutMCWh8Ke7HAjUTI9yOmWFfSyohPFA9FDh25MVdtf4arKwNYW13rmpl QSeh4ZkOIYZePm39V1RdW5UbZuPQ90cUcK1LsIQI/glUC5PJ+nz42EXmOp01Fn9/+aJ4 c/HLZ+8L5jY263HA/VxSY1UiKxeL9dcx/LA29dYcxRIWYA0zr+h/8GHUqUa+gFC7XYle skSI9gVSMXYwOqAa+ludQMQX43cGBttvZ1l93+q8KVpgliUjyB+2k6jyCnlNLytHwepV bOSg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2Hb6z/hlLBAwUtqgvm7Fr5u3McJabvOAY7n/+X1YNqeEkjCUIr 67FsbEPlRI+wXUcGzRVdjxjZtw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:fa4d:0:b0:43c:7fa:95f7 with SMTP id g13-20020a63fa4d000000b0043c07fa95f7mr16881241pgk.48.1664765963310; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 19:59:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com ([240f:75:7537:3187:fdaf:f7a6:50c8:e952]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m12-20020a17090a34cc00b0020a8ed65df3sm1649230pjf.45.2022.10.02.19.59.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 02 Oct 2022 19:59:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 11:59:18 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: Brian Geffon Cc: Andrew Morton , Minchan Kim , Nitin Gupta , Sergey Senozhatsky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suleiman Souhlal , Rom Lemarchand , linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] zram: Always expose rw_page Message-ID: References: <20220930195215.2360317-1-bgeffon@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220930195215.2360317-1-bgeffon@google.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On (22/09/30 15:52), Brian Geffon wrote: > Currently zram will adjust its fops to a version which does not > contain rw_page when a backing device has been assigned. This is > done to prevent upper layers from assuming a synchronous operation > when a page may have been written back. This forces every operation > through bio which has overhead associated with bio_alloc/frees. > > The code can be simplified to always expose a rw_page method and > only in the rare event that a page is written back we instead will > return -EOPNOTSUPP forcing the upper layer to fallback to bio. Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky > @@ -1267,6 +1253,9 @@ static int __zram_bvec_read(struct zram *zram, struct page *page, u32 index, > struct bio_vec bvec; > > zram_slot_unlock(zram, index); > + /* If we don't have a bio we came via rw_page, we must fallback to bio */ > + if (!bio) > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; The comment is above 80 cols.