Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755610AbXFYE3b (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jun 2007 00:29:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752535AbXFYE3W (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jun 2007 00:29:22 -0400 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.181]:46738 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750968AbXFYE3V (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jun 2007 00:29:21 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=c8moSNlGRj5Cx//qukJC8OTD+NYUGeD6UvJDf46iFuE5iJ0F76p03dTCTTnWcWlOEKy+kldJgyOC7fpLfV3pux6LGKPRKbBzVKrw4wfl2if8P60U99ZzeoaBxb++HNM1qTPBAYDzZyV/LwlZB2NSwLl5bk3gWkszC+WZPaj4QJI= Message-ID: <467F449B.1040200@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:29:15 +0900 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Icedove 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070307) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Petr Vandrovec CC: Robert Hancock , Jeff Garzik , Andrew Morton , enricoss@tiscali.it, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.22-rc5] libata: add HTS541616J9SA00 to NCQ blacklist References: <467EC909.9040006@shaw.ca> <467F2495.3080509@gmail.com> <467F286B.40607@gmail.com> <467F2ADF.1040600@shaw.ca> <467F2D53.2000202@gmail.com> <467F3AE2.7010606@vc.cvut.cz> <467F3EF6.4000907@gmail.com> <467F4031.8000406@shaw.ca> <467F42F3.1000609@vc.cvut.cz> In-Reply-To: <467F42F3.1000609@vc.cvut.cz> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 994 Lines: 23 Petr Vandrovec wrote: >>> Hmmm... The last one (HTS541612J9SA00) is taken directly from hdparm >>> output, and I think I verified the patch with the reporter. Hmm... Can >>> anyone verify these module strings? >> >> Could well be that they've started attaching Hitachi to the ID strings >> now.. In the past it hasn't seemed to have been Hitachi's (and IBM's >> before that) practice to have it there, but maybe they see the >> advantage of being able to figure out who made the drive now :-) > > Perhaps ones sold directly by Hitachi are Hitachi, while ones sold > through OEMs are no-name? I dunno but I doubt they care that much about the model string but one way or the other we might have to do pattern matching on HTS541* anyway. -- tejun - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/