Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 3 Oct 2022 13:23:13 -0400
From:   Eric Chanudet <echanude@redhat.com>
To:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>,
        Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mailbox: qcom-ipcc: Use generic_handle_irq_safe()
Message-ID: <20221003172313.vv3isog3nsc3r2pn@echanude>
References: <20220909162043.2734873-1-echanude@redhat.com>
 <YyBP+eNIBCN0OsGt@linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YyBP+eNIBCN0OsGt@linutronix.de>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 11:40:09AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2022-09-09 12:20:43 [-0400], Eric Chanudet wrote:
> > PREEMPT_RT forces qcom-ipcc's handler to be threaded with interrupts
> > enabled, which triggers a warning in __handle_irq_event_percpu().
> > 
> > Use generic_handle_irq_safe() that can be called with or without
> > interrupts enabled instead.
> 
> wouldn't IRQF_NO_THREAD be a better match here?

Agreed, my apologies for the delay:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20221003170849.383005-1-echanude@redhat.com/

Thanks,

-- 
Eric Chanudet