Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 3 Oct 2022 15:07:08 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To:     Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     "Artem S. Tashkinov" <aros@gmx.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
        Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>,
        workflows@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        "regressions@lists.linux.dev" <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
        ksummit@lists.linux.dev,
        Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Subject: Re: Planned changes for bugzilla.kernel.org to reduce the "Bugzilla
 blues"
Message-ID: <20221003150708.5f5a409b@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <Yzsox+Q6mKSpQuc6@ZenIV>
References: <6de0925c-a98a-219e-eed2-ba898ef974f8@gmx.com>
        <20221002180844.2e91b1f1@rorschach.local.home>
        <3a3b9346-e243-e178-f8dd-f8e1eacdc6ae@gmx.com>
        <YzoY+dxLuCfOp0sL@ZenIV>
        <b032e79a-a9e3-fc72-9ced-39411e5464c9@gmx.com>
        <YzqjfU66alRlGk5y@kernel.org>
        <251201be-9552-3a51-749c-3daf4d181250@gmx.com>
        <CAMuHMdX8Ko_LiqsWafzcqheW_7SZmtzEvgrpBbyoCLxyWqjqBg@mail.gmail.com>
        <1d3fdc6a-a98a-fe3b-2e3e-acc2ffa24f9d@gmx.com>
        <20221003102029.1fe4f31b@gandalf.local.home>
        <Yzsox+Q6mKSpQuc6@ZenIV>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 19:24:07 +0100
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:

> Way more than 800, IME.  And I'm still subscribed to it, even though
> reading through the damn thing isn't physically possible.  About 1 or 2
> percents gets past the "delete unopened" pass...

I keep the last 10 weeks in my folder (and archive the rest.) That's 70
days worth, and I have 78,109 emails currently in that folder. OK, it's
been a while since I last took the average. It appears to be 1114 emails
per day now. I blame the extra 300 emails a day being the stable updates :-D

> 
> Speaking of private mail... there's one case when it's warranted -
> a bug that looks like a sufficiently nasty security hole in something that
> would be sufficiently widely deployed.  Preferably - with something along
> the lines of "off-list due to potential security impact".
> 
> Still a matter of taste - security@ is an option for those...

I was about to say "then include the security@ mailing list". ;-)

It's still not a private one. But for those that do not know about that
mailing list, yeah, private is fine. But that's not really the focus of
this discussion.

-- Steve