Received: by 2002:a05:6359:c8b:b0:c7:702f:21d4 with SMTP id go11csp3404627rwb; Mon, 3 Oct 2022 14:38:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM58AE64Dk5AabMvGkkrqj7Drvr78JsCu3nXor9xJbU34PQbiovYyXynWTIjchwsXgX97T+4 X-Received: by 2002:a65:6955:0:b0:439:a99b:bca5 with SMTP id w21-20020a656955000000b00439a99bbca5mr20434012pgq.80.1664833114625; Mon, 03 Oct 2022 14:38:34 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1664833114; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=H/IsIR7MWLiH/BzFKFq6VNhkRSpWNAXHyqjT4ftrz895cFZA5qzOv5EVWxyfhu+meI VsXAmxmxFlw+y9YjeAc8LOKiljqzCBgFfLodp+v6OylZGt0kA1jNbqM2ALGgOaFyXvNN BInDiw4baqfR/drBcRGr5fxxWsaPaEvCikqLqExJ2ayKfnFwsXtT5y+0Stq7yVbx7kcV j3mkw+CCB/gHXiZP9WvWYExrdL/kkba59qk7pLFTlmZXbFmMNn2wcJWOc56Xwf87IHvy DROu9lqZG4zk0CX2lnYrORCeqm6cHCbU4twygL4QJNVRdD+TlfbcXj3HVETiE33WVqpg iOUw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=fbNSi/v14+901vFsAnl8/1DlUkDa+Lq06tjJP60k1+8=; b=AY6gALDH2orcUy6O59g+H2XGclFz13O3GJ9Z5ZeLdrITqcbl3DeDgGQ1UAvWTpd0DJ JyujGHvlZxrC/ZwXiNEEqsxGc5MiLILzcVAPO0+/tgrn1O49D5LBqLlrBYMAyuoR2Ae1 raT2FHv08NrC9YLSHeuL6X7vLSBGYLsPR4nx1+QctcUthl6VdwHN27B4QI/elDl8Q3Ry iPO4mLTsA9jVytjpeK3JOrcuW3wKDN6I08NKYl/v5neA3/eTOOjyUyTQnbwiNdvh0nmC Ir+VyIRYoWwyY6gghsX7ZDylCGUpQGHhdkDaz2lbBEhq1W/7rn7xPltT7n4I7WPxqv4d 59rw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@alien8.de header.s=dkim header.b=LXjhsFt8; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alien8.de Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h5-20020a63e145000000b0041d296674edsi11641964pgk.677.2022.10.03.14.38.22; Mon, 03 Oct 2022 14:38:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@alien8.de header.s=dkim header.b=LXjhsFt8; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alien8.de Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229803AbiJCV3U (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 3 Oct 2022 17:29:20 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45122 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229826AbiJCV2y (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Oct 2022 17:28:54 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:190:11c2::b:1457]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1AAE205FC; Mon, 3 Oct 2022 14:20:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ea9733e751329c23fffea6a903.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ea:9733:e751:329c:23ff:fea6:a903]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 38DD31EC04F0; Mon, 3 Oct 2022 23:20:02 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1664832002; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=fbNSi/v14+901vFsAnl8/1DlUkDa+Lq06tjJP60k1+8=; b=LXjhsFt8EX9gCxNbzylgEg7Sg+OOriaw6t4GBWXfFxpNYKhaGBJyyTWzl/DsVMM/MdAU8p sizG0L3bjzoSVYtBnYMe2d0WscCeeDdobd57fDUcKz0rXLYxSAD6gSbjhOd+JJ89y4RjuO 9c6jf+ItrZeRrLCY+HZOI0D4s+Zu3ew= Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 23:19:58 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Marc Zyngier Cc: Randy Dunlap , Thomas Gleixner , broonie@kernel.org, Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 30 (i386 non-SMP non-APIC w/ IRQ_DOMAIN: build errors) Message-ID: References: <20220930154710.548289-1-broonie@kernel.org> <8635c4bw6i.wl-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8635c4bw6i.wl-maz@kernel.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 07:26:29PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Can x86 practically deal with MSIs without the APIC? If not, we should > instead find a way to forbid MSIs when APIC isn't selected. Or make > APIC support mandatory. Well, you need the local APIC in order to send MSIs, that's why X86_LOCAL_APIC depends on PCI_MSI. I'll have a look at that .config tomorrow. Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette