Received: by 2002:a05:6359:c8b:b0:c7:702f:21d4 with SMTP id go11csp184255rwb; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 02:30:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7m7C1OTd1WmYbY++0nHKl5nOidy8Nc3EtUXdhY/Ul8WpuyJd+HK8pjySJ9jf81eYS283C8 X-Received: by 2002:a65:408b:0:b0:42a:55fb:60b0 with SMTP id t11-20020a65408b000000b0042a55fb60b0mr22588407pgp.431.1664875857737; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 02:30:57 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1664875857; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=PHlaTtXw1dcpYnCMwsPbA3VXqfpKDU87g8PrmqOy1S6M3efBR4D5HRYmcFzIY8R379 EYM+KJ5TW6aBJUlHLVwaAaSeKNb9rKDtrI+8bvYZ771k68zh2BOHiONq12xD1fNINR79 JeD6XQW0DxeLFLNbWUsGbqu7DZBSxaGueGNdYZMFLtaqMucUasAT6INVcxAq4VPlrW+X 9RglhEVyQVUHITZl4nX34jsrwuL644kOL45EQro+Fwn0U/B0ddiLkYgUMuuZBgKZPnds lJJs7RsV3Uj423fgV3v5FTpwZOXpIg5sn4m9ALKTlQQJccGw6LloJpmlCw79PL1+5bBu MQLQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:organization:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=Skq6d9q3ZT2dwlzi7MzZFhv2ri/xLlH7tIZZlvJW86E=; b=KNpGOMKzZw9oKPO5FO4giTCG+/5LGodnMfXg/TfYqRj64t/Hfg0iJEAOfWIwH2JjZ2 ElhBCQZFsYVcCXfx8d5rkcVFXh3XgmHz1T6ajhpXF4FCoR2A7ZREtd6ylrE+nYDTjniy KeYGxRa6f4r5U2opHVwt6bcdG/6obZDnE60FmfvBC5kH8rRcByHmoOO6iW+rSMMW1G0o PvCyx/baEMr4Z747MJh4K6Fk/U4Fw9fVzeP+gUVqsnYP/RGaZ/rTzSWvD5P2RYaIVVWo o/pfnkkpVRUkOeAhK4X+WpOzCTRHK0s11Bni8dv4HRSpM4Jke/snwH5FmY0/MFSXHQxe IrLw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=RM+J6YMT; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b12-20020a056a00114c00b00538186c29ccsi11680226pfm.100.2022.10.04.02.30.45; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 02:30:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=RM+J6YMT; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231202AbiJDJXR (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 4 Oct 2022 05:23:17 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38362 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230354AbiJDJWO (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2022 05:22:14 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AC40E023; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 02:21:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1664875307; x=1696411307; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=6C1wn4VpHnxwWmqYZoBN4fkhztrWvlQuE4Ow78yD49E=; b=RM+J6YMTEC742JbACvzmNjKVKNA0ZjJXwmQ5k9RSzviNVPGOSZpoqHK1 nuT+r0MMtKxvOcsd68NqaHbjfzIgCB6dR9qUQepl/Qfq7SiyeWIk+1CTW CVVZUfXpEiEQbyTLS4ZBrcCCzVjHbWuSlHztW+rBS5LMq2TmPdCmXvam2 eDoMV9rIMhR+5q9A/vt1rsjqMFoy7CybaEys1WUtdOU1tqpCq8YxD8jjm +dunaZ/z/Mq+A5VHhHnu01ASdY7cKA1NnLvoqFAbo6tw/QxoJ2l2HYGoV ts6Vvs5QNB2dGJh8V/0AyDLawK7XBfZ4JyJan9GJtT9+eVHuzT9rZ9edg A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10489"; a="302843615" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,367,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="302843615" Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Oct 2022 02:21:47 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10489"; a="868932506" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,367,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="868932506" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Oct 2022 02:21:44 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1ofe7T-001zQw-0f; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 12:21:43 +0300 Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 12:21:42 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Sakari Ailus , Heikki Krogerus , Bjorn Andersson , Prashant Malani , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Scally , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] device property: Keep dev_fwnode() and dev_fwnode_const() separate Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 11:25:56AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 10:24:13AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 11:14:14AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 09:55:21AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 08:08:58PM +0000, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 06:17:17PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: ... > > > > > #define kobj_to_dev(kobj) \ > > > > > (_Generic((kobj), \ > > > > > const struct kobject *: __kobj_to_dev_const, \ > > > > > struct kobject *: __kobj_to_dev)(kobj)) > > > > > > > > Ah, doh! I had the (kobj) part in the wrong place, thanks for that > > > > fix... > > > > > > > > Ok, this looks better, let me see how well the build breaks with some of > > > > these changes > > > > > > I believe I can rewrite my patch like this and then it will be much nicer since > > > we may constify all the rest without calling __dev_fwnode_const() directly. > > > > > > Are you agree? > > > > Yes, I think this is a much better option, try it and see. Below is the > > patch I'm running through my build systems at the moment, feel free to > > copy the style for your change as well. > > Yep, thanks for sharing! v3 has been just sent out. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko