Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:42:24 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
cc: Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>,
       Grozdan Nikolov <microchip@chello.be>,
       Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@firmix.at>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How innovative is Linux?
In-Reply-To: <20070625093712.850557f8.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706251841420.3137@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
References: <200706231417.16086.microchip@chello.be> <1182621207.3683.0.camel@gimli.at.home>
 <200706232015.33527.microchip@chello.be> <20070625151226.GJ10008@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
 <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706251715200.3137@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
 <20070625093712.850557f8.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 949
Lines: 25


On Jun 25 2007 09:37, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:15:50 +0200 (CEST) Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> On Jun 25 2007 11:12, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>> >
>> >It is also quite likely the reply was written before reading the other
>> >comments.  With the volume on lkml, reading all comments in a thread
>> >before writing any replies is just not possible.
>> 
>> Perhaps the list needs to be split up, e.g. linux-politics@vger :)
>
>I'm for that (including a place for GPL discussions), but I think that
>people would still just overload lkml instead of using the split lists.

Then turn it around: the technical part becomes a separate list. Sort of like
netfilter and netfilter-devel.


	Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/