Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20221001190807.358691-1-marijn.suijten@somainline.org>
 <20221001190807.358691-6-marijn.suijten@somainline.org> <20221001202313.fkdsv5ul4v6akhc3@SoMainline.org>
In-Reply-To: <20221001202313.fkdsv5ul4v6akhc3@SoMainline.org>
From:   Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 4 Oct 2022 17:41:07 +0300
Message-ID: <CAA8EJpricAKmrtqGJx_ngqyqCWjc2rbrOcsE5QaH5qKaHP7-2g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] drm/dsc: Prevent negative BPG offsets from shadowing
 adjacent bitfields
To:     Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
        phone-devel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
        Martin Botka <martin.botka@somainline.org>,
        Jami Kettunen <jami.kettunen@somainline.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>,
        Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
        Vladimir Lypak <vladimir.lypak@gmail.com>,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
        Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, 1 Oct 2022 at 23:23, Marijn Suijten
<marijn.suijten@somainline.org> wrote:
>
> On 2022-10-01 21:08:07, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > msm's dsi_host specifies negative BPG offsets which fill the full 8 bits
> > of a char thanks to two's complement: this however results in those bits
> > bleeding into the next parameter when the field is only expected to
> > contain 6-bit wide values.
> > As a consequence random slices appear corrupted on-screen (tested on a
> > Sony Tama Akatsuki device with sdm845).
> >
> > Use AND operators to limit all values that constitute the RC Range
> > parameter fields to their expected size.
> >
> > Fixes: b9080324d6ca ("drm/msm/dsi: add support for dsc data")
> > Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dsc_helper.c | 6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dsc_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dsc_helper.c
> > index c869c6e51e2b..2e7ef242685d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dsc_helper.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dsc_helper.c
> > @@ -243,11 +243,11 @@ void drm_dsc_pps_payload_pack(struct drm_dsc_picture_parameter_set *pps_payload,
> >        */
> >       for (i = 0; i < DSC_NUM_BUF_RANGES; i++) {
> >               pps_payload->rc_range_parameters[i] =
> > -                     cpu_to_be16((dsc_cfg->rc_range_params[i].range_min_qp <<
> > +                     cpu_to_be16(((dsc_cfg->rc_range_params[i].range_min_qp & 0x1f) <<
> >                                    DSC_PPS_RC_RANGE_MINQP_SHIFT) |
> > -                                 (dsc_cfg->rc_range_params[i].range_max_qp <<
> > +                                 ((dsc_cfg->rc_range_params[i].range_max_qp & 0x1f) <<
> >                                    DSC_PPS_RC_RANGE_MAXQP_SHIFT) |
> > -                                 (dsc_cfg->rc_range_params[i].range_bpg_offset));
> > +                                 (dsc_cfg->rc_range_params[i].range_bpg_offset & 0x3f));
>
> Pre-empting the reviews: I was contemplating whether to use FIELD_PREP
> here, given that it's not yet used anywhere else in this file.  For that
> I'd remove the existing _SHIFT definitions and replace them with:
>
>         #define DSC_PPS_RC_RANGE_MINQP_MASK             GENMASK(15, 11)
>         #define DSC_PPS_RC_RANGE_MAXQP_MASK             GENMASK(10, 6)
>         #define DSC_PPS_RC_RANGE_BPG_OFFSET_MASK        GENMASK(5, 0)
>
> And turn this section of code into:
>
>         cpu_to_be16(FIELD_PREP(DSC_PPS_RC_RANGE_MINQP_MASK,
>                                dsc_cfg->rc_range_params[i].range_min_qp) |
>                     FIELD_PREP(DSC_PPS_RC_RANGE_MAXQP_MASK,
>                                dsc_cfg->rc_range_params[i].range_max_qp) |
>                     FIELD_PREP(DSC_PPS_RC_RANGE_BPG_OFFSET_MASK,
>                                dsc_cfg->rc_range_params[i].range_bpg_offset));
>
> Is that okay/recommended?

This is definitely easier to review. However if you do not want to use
FIELD_PREP, it would be better to split this into a series of `data |=
something` assignments terminated with the rc_range_parameters[i]
assignment.

>
> - Marijn
>
> >       }
> >
> >       /* PPS 88 */
> > --
> > 2.37.3
> >


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry