Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 4 Oct 2022 19:45:56 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
        f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com,
        srw@sladewatkins.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/83] 5.15.72-rc1 review
Message-ID: <YzxxVJqph3iOHcdb@kroah.com>
References: <20221003070721.971297651@linuxfoundation.org>
 <e7934bdb-fb0a-76cd-0fd2-f9b8da03170d@roeck-us.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <e7934bdb-fb0a-76cd-0fd2-f9b8da03170d@roeck-us.net>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 07:26:40AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/3/22 00:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.72 release.
> > There are 83 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 05 Oct 2022 07:07:06 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> 
> perf fails to build.
> 
> In file included from util/evlist.h:13,
>                  from builtin-annotate.c:21:
> util/evsel.h:266:38: error: ‘PERF_TOOL_MAX’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘PERF_TXN_MAX’?
>   266 | extern const char *evsel__tool_names[PERF_TOOL_MAX];
>       |                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |                                      PERF_TXN_MAX
> In file included from util/hist.h:8,
>                  from builtin-diff.c:13:
> util/evsel.h:266:38: error: ‘PERF_TOOL_MAX’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘PERF_TXN_MAX’?
>   266 | extern const char *evsel__tool_names[PERF_TOOL_MAX];
>       |                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |                                      PERF_TXN_MAX
> In file included from util/evlist.h:13,
>                  from builtin-evlist.c:11:
> util/evsel.h:266:38: error: ‘PERF_TOOL_MAX’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘PERF_TXN_MAX’?
>   266 | extern const char *evsel__tool_names[PERF_TOOL_MAX];
>       |                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |                                      PERF_TXN_MAX
> In file included from tools/perf/util/evlist.h:13,
>                  from builtin-ftrace.c:24:
> tools/perf/util/evsel.h:266:38: error: ‘PERF_TOOL_MAX’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘PERF_TXN_MAX’?
>   266 | extern const char *evsel__tool_names[PERF_TOOL_MAX];
>       |                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |                                      PERF_TXN_MAX
> builtin-annotate.c: In function ‘cmd_annotate’:
> builtin-annotate.c:594:8: error: implicit declaration of function ‘symbol__validate_sym_arguments’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   594 |  ret = symbol__validate_sym_arguments();
>       |        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Thanks, I've dropped all perf patches from the 5.15 queue right now as
they seem to have been added incorrectly.

That being said, I can't build perf for 5.15.y now anyway, so something
older must have broken my system, glad it's building for you...

thanks

greg k-h