Received: by 2002:a05:6359:c8b:b0:c7:702f:21d4 with SMTP id go11csp1560931rwb; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 01:09:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5dSTvdWWO53rPi1g5+KHDo/MxUWfiXS+C5dbIsrvM5HWoNWbNRphzlzqQDTddkGdDxsVSx X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1c07:b0:200:9728:b8cd with SMTP id oc7-20020a17090b1c0700b002009728b8cdmr3948582pjb.139.1664957366621; Wed, 05 Oct 2022 01:09:26 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1664957366; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Ot9fZp1Q3Rv9ou1i1lJiq+52tLkcvYICQ3HCZ5foi6oM+ufWeDUtqIoqUagWNJ+Phv vOt74S+WaAqlauVDX/KqTOqeBqNSNC4GoZuMVYJ5m3cszMjazHWuDZ1+iVeRKSWCPPaz B+COC7/Gt0cMjR+EWKEs1HtIA693ZWczLDwNlqUvc2/5W/Py8gbuN0G2ntHcjOMXHK+Q v3n3Oy/j3sONFPHBeyArPObouew9zJX2f7OXCFc9luQQEPG2vC1QOxxigrB5BRAOdBB8 fubN4hZHp7l9Ni3him8EC08wHjrFAk/W0iK9ZTLkzf5d2YqU+ra/cdNCVRseqK7p3mpA x2Dg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=oPna6wWjjJJtwhLYuFWEeO++CoVa3btL/AxqM6R/AAQ=; b=y9F+Lr6SpbLpQfQPwdw3S++VeR/MIQfqkvNMnQgeBkRoAg0b6R3V/ndjdPbpENReFb JeNOHtGPRjhWHNQl2lCChAvu27d8zwy7FrYtGPd2+KMNyg5XiFUKQ5WNeXvwIaUdiiAk 4/d6Ri1Ti3FAhi5vnjRmt5f/9asYLHyGF7XLMFV7V5teTpcA7qisvDOwxPFu3LqPUxGx Q+DJsjmNjyLK7RGkQy7DkgLq4wyPiFl4PS498bwZv1cdv0icpJ8Cc7GvxqB6Iyog7LZ6 RmILU3zoMx99QY+SMSROpA2Td+DgBQGld3Tj9qIz11Z0OxyqGTXEHy7sdOf5f/mMINDS Uaow== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h4-20020a635744000000b0042b807728e3si15900552pgm.762.2022.10.05.01.09.13; Wed, 05 Oct 2022 01:09:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229941AbiJEHfw (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 5 Oct 2022 03:35:52 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50526 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229786AbiJEHfp (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2022 03:35:45 -0400 Received: from 1wt.eu (wtarreau.pck.nerim.net [62.212.114.60]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89DAC543F2; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 00:35:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from willy@localhost) by pcw.home.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 2957YtGi004237; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 09:34:55 +0200 Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 09:34:54 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: Romain Perier Cc: Stephen Boyd , Daniel Palmer , Michael Turquette , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v5 1/1] clk: mstar: msc313 cpupll clk driver Message-ID: <20221005073454.GA3728@1wt.eu> References: <20220603190509.45986-1-romain.perier@gmail.com> <20220603190509.45986-2-romain.perier@gmail.com> <20220930191742.9A9FEC433C1@smtp.kernel.org> <20220930193535.GB9469@1wt.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 09:33:40AM +0200, Romain Perier wrote: > Hi, > > Quiet frankly I don't want to debate about this , as is it seems to be > basically "the rule" (see > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v6.0/process/submitting-patches.html). > It is okay for you Willy, if I transform your tag to > "Co-developed-by:" plus a "Signed-off-by" ? So Stephen can apply it , > and everyone is happy :) Yes absolutely! I just wanted to avoid yet another round trip. Many thanks Romain! Willy