Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220603190509.45986-1-romain.perier@gmail.com>
 <20220603190509.45986-2-romain.perier@gmail.com> <20220930191742.9A9FEC433C1@smtp.kernel.org>
 <20220930193535.GB9469@1wt.eu>
In-Reply-To: <20220930193535.GB9469@1wt.eu>
From:   Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 5 Oct 2022 09:33:40 +0200
Message-ID: <CABgxDoK-r_ENKo4qcB3PbCS2KOifHhzMvy1gWM=8yEsrH4JVvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v5 1/1] clk: mstar: msc313 cpupll clk driver
To:     Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Daniel Palmer <daniel@0x0f.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

Quiet frankly I don't want to debate about this , as is it seems to be
basically "the rule" (see
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v6.0/process/submitting-patches.html).
It is okay for you Willy, if I transform your tag to
"Co-developed-by:" plus a "Signed-off-by" ? So Stephen can apply it ,
and everyone is happy :)

Cheers,
Romain

Le ven. 30 sept. 2022 =C3=A0 21:35, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> a =C3=A9crit :
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 12:17:40PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Romain Perier (2022-06-03 12:05:09)
> > > From: Daniel Palmer <daniel@0x0f.com>
> > >
> > > Add a driver for the CPU pll/ARM pll/MIPS pll that is present
> > > in MStar SoCs.
> > >
> > > Currently there is no documentation for this block so it's possible
> > > this driver isn't entirely correct.
> > >
> > > Only tested on the version of this IP in the MStar/SigmaStar
> > > ARMv7 SoCs.
> > >
> > > Co-authored-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
> >
> > This is not a standard tag, maybe Co-developed-by is what you want?
>
> Yeah it's the same. We're seeing 122 co-authored-by tags in the
> kernel's history vs 3122 co-developed-by, so that's only 3% but
> at least not a fantasist one..
>
> > A Signed-off-by tag should be here from Willy Tarreau then.
>
> Not all commits follow this, but indeed some do. Regardless I
> really don't care at all about my name being listed there.
>
> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Palmer <daniel@0x0f.com>
> >
> > Your Signed-off-by needs to be here. I can't apply this otherwise.
>
> Quite frankly, we're talking about an old patch that was first
> submitted 9 months ago (!), let's not postpone it even further just
> for headers reason, please just drop this line mentioning my
> little contribution, I don't care a single second at all, really.
>
> Thanks,
> Willy