Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 13:23:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 13:23:16 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:53261 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 13:23:03 -0500 Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 16:22:38 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk , Subject: Re: /proc/sys/vm/(max|min)-readahead effect???? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > > > I've just upgraded to 2.4.16 to get /proc/sys/vm/(max|min)-readahead > > available. I've got this idea... > > > > If lots of files (some hundered) are read simultaously, I waste all the > > i/o time in seeks. However, if I increase the readahead, it'll read more > > data at a time, and end up with seeking a lot less. > > Do you also have VM pressure going on or do you have lots of free memory ? I suspect the per-device readahead for IDE is limiting the effect of vm_max_readahead ... Rik -- Shortwave goes a long way: irc.starchat.net #swl http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/