Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 13:35:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 13:35:47 -0500 Received: from khan.acc.umu.se ([130.239.18.139]:58099 "EHLO khan.acc.umu.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 13:35:32 -0500 Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 19:35:24 +0100 From: David Weinehall To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Linux-Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [Todo] Remove usage of (f)suser in kernel Message-ID: <20011205193524.U360@khan.acc.umu.se> In-Reply-To: <20011205181558.R360@khan.acc.umu.se> <3C0E63F8.8CD0B9CA@mandrakesoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <3C0E63F8.8CD0B9CA@mandrakesoft.com>; from jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com on Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 01:14:16PM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 01:14:16PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > David Weinehall wrote: > > After a quick round of grep:ing, I came up with the following files > > needing fixes to substitute usage of (f)suser for proper capabilities: > [...] > > Since I don't know what the maintainers of some of these files want > > as capabilities, I've decided not to fix this myself. zr36120.c is > > only a matter of removing an #ifdef/#else/#endif combo and doing some > > reindenting, though. > > We need to kill those in 2.5 I think. s/suser/capable(...)/ has been on > the kernel janitor's list for a while. That was kind of my intention behind this, yes. /David _ _ // David Weinehall /> Northern lights wander \\ // Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/