Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAG48ez3h-mnp9ZFC10v+-BW_8NQvxbwBsMYJFP8JX31o0B17Pg@mail.gmail.com>
 <Yz7316NubHtw2xCa@nvidia.com> <CAG48ez1Oz4tT-N2Y=Zs6jumu=zOp7SQRZ=V2c+b5bT9P4retJA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG48ez1Oz4tT-N2Y=Zs6jumu=zOp7SQRZ=V2c+b5bT9P4retJA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Date:   Thu, 6 Oct 2022 17:58:09 +0200
Message-ID: <CAG48ez2sutJOkHvaPzA8hNhYQrea_bUxbWq3pTO1qqJ1JKBb5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ptep_get_lockless() on 32-bit x86/mips/sh looks wrong
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc:     Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 5:55 PM Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> wrote:
> A: returns physical address 0x000100020x00010000, which was never
> actually in the PTE

Sorry, typo, that was supposed to be 0x0001000200010000.