Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= <heiko@sntech.de>
To:     Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Cc:     linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] riscv: move riscv_noncoherent_supported() out of ZICBOM probe
Date:   Fri, 07 Oct 2022 11:18:45 +0200
Message-ID: <4842439.0VBMTVartN@diego>
In-Reply-To: <20221006070818.3616-2-jszhang@kernel.org>
References: <20221006070818.3616-1-jszhang@kernel.org> <20221006070818.3616-2-jszhang@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

Am Donnerstag, 6. Oktober 2022, 09:08:11 CEST schrieb Jisheng Zhang:
> It's a bit wired to call riscv_noncoherent_supported() once when
> insmod a module. Move the calling out of feature patch func.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 7 +------
>  arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c      | 4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index 3b5583db9d80..03611b3ef45e 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -272,12 +272,7 @@ static bool __init_or_module cpufeature_probe_zicbom(unsigned int stage)
>  	case RISCV_ALTERNATIVES_EARLY_BOOT:
>  		return false;
>  	default:
> -		if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, ZICBOM)) {
> -			riscv_noncoherent_supported();
> -			return true;
> -		} else {
> -			return false;
> -		}
> +		return riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, ZICBOM);
>  	}
>  #endif
>  
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> index 2dfc463b86bb..1a055c3f5d9d 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -299,6 +299,10 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>  	riscv_init_cbom_blocksize();
>  	riscv_fill_hwcap();
>  	apply_boot_alternatives();
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT
> +	if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, ZICBOM))
> +		riscv_noncoherent_supported();
> +#endif

The nice thing about doing this in cpufeature_probe_zicbom is that
you keep all the "ifs" in one place, where now you have 2 places that
check the existence of the extension.

The overhead is one "x = true" setting on each call to _probe() and with
this change things are now also handled differently between the main
implementation and the deviants.

Though I guess, I'll let others do the judgement call on what is the
desired way to go ;-) .


Heiko