Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] docs: improve the HTML formatting of kerneldoc
 comments
In-Reply-To: <20221005065909.33ba2523@sal.lan>
References: <20221004201222.281845-1-corbet@lwn.net>
 <20221004201222.281845-6-corbet@lwn.net> <20221005065909.33ba2523@sal.lan>
Date:   Fri, 07 Oct 2022 10:26:28 -0600
Message-ID: <877d1bmwgb.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org> writes:

> As I didn't test the patches, it sounds worth mentioning that it makes
> sense to check if this won't badly affect epub and/or LaTeX/PDF outputs.
>
> The LaTeX output generator in particular has a problem with long
> lines with fixed-width lines: if the text doesn't fit into one line, it
> either truncates it or makes the text go outside the margins.
>
> If the container affects the PDF outputs, we need to double-check if
> this would break its output.

So as far as I can tell, the PDF output is entirely unaffected.  I have
not read it all, though!  Is there a place in particular that you know
to be problematic where I should look?

Thanks,

jon