Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757322AbXFZN2g (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jun 2007 09:28:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753039AbXFZN23 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jun 2007 09:28:29 -0400 Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:63289 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752236AbXFZN23 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jun 2007 09:28:29 -0400 Message-ID: <46811442.5070308@trash.net> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:27:30 +0200 From: Patrick McHardy User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070601) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vasily Averin CC: Eric Dumazet , "David S. Miller" , netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, Linux Kernel Mailing List , devel@openvz.org Subject: Re: [NETFILTER] early_drop() imrovement (v3) References: <4615FE1D.80206@sw.ru> <20070406102433.d3a670a5.dada1@cosmosbay.com> <4616203A.80203@sw.ru> <4616626C.9020100@trash.net> <4617845F.7080203@sw.ru> <461789CF.8000106@cosmosbay.com> <46187770.1070106@sw.ru> <46417137.5080501@sw.ru> <467FC8D2.5070102@trash.net> <46811292.1010501@sw.ru> In-Reply-To: <46811292.1010501@sw.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1634 Lines: 36 Vasily Averin wrote: > Patrick McHardy wrote: >> I don't like the NF_CT_PER_BUCKET constant. First of all, each >> conntrack is hashed twice, so its really only 1/2 of the average >> conntracks per bucket. Secondly, its only a default and many >> people use nf_conntrack_max = nf_conntrack_htable_size / 2, so >> using this constant for early_drop seems wrong. >> >> Perhaps make it 2 * nf_conntrack_max / nf_conntrack_htable_size >> or even add a nf_conntrack_eviction_range sysctl. >> > > IMHO The number of conntracks checked in early_drop() have following restrictions: > - it should be not too low -- to decrease chances of transmission failures, > - it should be limited by some reasonable value -- to prevent long check delays. Agreed. > Also I believe it makes sense to have it constant (how about NF_CT_EVICTION > name?) -- to have the same behaviour on various nodes. However I doubt strongly > that anybody will want to change this value. Do you think it is really required? > I don't know. The current behaviour will on average scan 16 entries. For people manually tuning their hash to saner settings it will scan a single entry. So we have a quite wide range of values already. The single entry with sane hash settings is too little IMO, maybe use some middle-ground, make it 8 by default as you did and rename the constant. NF_CT_EVICTION_RANGE sounds fine. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/