Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757495AbXFZOne (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jun 2007 10:43:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752236AbXFZOn2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jun 2007 10:43:28 -0400 Received: from mesiob.obspm.fr ([145.238.2.2]:59545 "EHLO mesiob.obspm.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750827AbXFZOn1 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jun 2007 10:43:27 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 589 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 10:43:27 EDT From: =?utf-8?q?Zolt=C3=A1n_HUBERT?= To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Please release a stable kernel Linux 3.0 Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:37:22 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200706212349.54983.zoltan.hubert@zzaero.com> <200706220057.33984.zoltan.hubert@zzaero.com> <4680FFB8.8020200@aitel.hist.no> In-Reply-To: <4680FFB8.8020200@aitel.hist.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706261637.22820.zoltan.hubert@zzaero.com> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (mesiob.obspm.fr [145.238.2.2]); Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:33:34 +0200 (CEST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1690 Lines: 59 On Tuesday 26 June 2007 13:59, Helge Hafting wrote: > Zoltán HUBERT wrote: > > Well, I'm using SuSE Pro 9.3 (excellent choice by the > > way), coming with kernel 2.6.10-SuSE > You either stick with SuSE 9.3 forever, or you > *try* something newer to see if it works, I did. It (2.6.15) didn't. Between 2.6.10 and 2.6.15 the suspend API changed. It was documented that it would change and break things and so it did. Is that what "stable" is about ? > >> I don't think you'll find very > >> many people on this list who gives a damn about the > >> troubles of closed source driver developers. > > > > and what about their users ? > > Users of closed-source drivers get their support from > the closed-source vendor - not from the kernel > developers. It is that simple. Translated: "It's not my fault" > Again - this is how all operating systems works. kernel 2.0/2.1 ? Debian stable/testing/unstable ? FreeBSD 5.5/FreeBSD 6.2 ? > If your vendor don't want to support you anymore, try > getting the source. I was asking for a stable kernel, like 2.4, 2.2, 2.0 were before. 2.6 is not. It's a great kernel, better than that of MacOS X, I never said you were doing a bad job, quite the contrary. I wouldn't be using Linux since 10 years if I thought it stinks. I never asked support for closed source drivers, only a stable kernel. Whatever "stable" means. z -- ________________________ Zoltan ________________________ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/