Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 10 Oct 2022 09:11:29 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc:     Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>,
        Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Jagath Jog J <jagathjog1996@gmail.com>,
        Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com>,
        Cosmin Tanislav <demonsingur@gmail.com>,
        linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] regulator: Add devm helpers for get and enable
Message-ID: <Y0O3kcR3+vSQEErn@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <cover.1665066397.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
 <fa667d6870976a2cf2d60f06e262982872349d74.1665066397.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
 <Yz7/o1q7p8NmGKMe@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <20221009132421.6e472385@jic23-huawei>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20221009132421.6e472385@jic23-huawei>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 01:24:21PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Oct 2022 19:17:39 +0300
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 05:36:52PM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote:

...

> > > (cherry picked from commit b6058e052b842a19c8bb639798d8692cd0e7589f)  
> > 
> > Not sure:
> >  - why this is in the commit message
> >  - what it points to, since
> > $ git show b6058e052b842a19c8bb639798d8692cd0e7589f
> >  fatal: bad object b6058e052b842a19c8bb639798d8692cd0e7589f
> 
> These are now upstream in Linus' tree and in my testing branch.

I don't see them. As I pointed out the commit IDs are not in the any of the
official trees (subsystem maintainer's or Linus'). Again, read my doubts about
the above commit message.

> I'd not normally advocate working on top of that (because I rebase it), but
> if it is useful for this series go ahead.

> > > Already in Mark's regulator tree. Not to be merged. Included just for
> > > the sake of the completeness. Will be dropped when series is rebased on
> > > top of the 6.1-rc1  
> > 
> > Ah, I see, but does it mean the commit has been rebased or you used wrong SHA?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko