Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 10 Oct 2022 15:12:34 +0200
From:   Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Iskren Chernev <iskren.chernev@gmail.com>,
        Martin Botka <martin.botka@somainline.org>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 34/40] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: align TLMM pin
 configuration with DT schema
Message-ID: <20221010131234.e4gxdaixs3acgayf@SoMainline.org>
References: <20220912061746.6311-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
 <20220912061746.6311-35-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
 <20221009174621.ecamh76faoibuykv@SoMainline.org>
 <d97b7d32-6e27-5a04-336b-0af6bd92c83c@linaro.org>
 <d6765e12-715a-066e-c6c3-63e0962ee3af@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <d6765e12-715a-066e-c6c3-63e0962ee3af@linaro.org>
Precedence: bulk

On 2022-10-10 07:31:31, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 10/10/2022 06:26, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 09/10/2022 13:46, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> >>> [..]
> >>> -				cmd {
> >>> +				cmd-pins-pins {
> >>
> >> Is this double -pins-pins suffix intended?
> >>
> > 
> > No, thanks for noticing it.
> 
> Wait, you commented on patch which was already merged. Fix is here already:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20220930192954.242546-11-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/

Correct, I came across this while working on another SoC on -next and
wasn't sure if this patch was pulled in through some staging branch, or
if you or I should send up a followup patch.  Seems you've already done
so, thanks!

- Marijn