Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 10 Oct 2022 16:42:16 +0100
From:   Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
To:     Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Cc:     John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/3] sched: Avoid placing RT threads on cores
 handling long softirqs
Message-ID: <20221010154216.6mw7fszdaoajurvm@wubuntu>
References: <20221003232033.3404802-3-jstultz@google.com>
 <20221004013611.1822-1-hdanton@sina.com>
 <CANDhNCoVzJ_MSyAigMkE-TMgfRQRkiK=G0_S3OwPfnXPuKu1iA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20221005002149.1876-1-hdanton@sina.com>
 <20221005060155.1571-1-hdanton@sina.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20221005060155.1571-1-hdanton@sina.com>
Precedence: bulk

On 10/05/22 14:01, Hillf Danton wrote:
> On 4 Oct 2022 18:13:52 -0700 John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
> > On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 5:22 PM Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> wrote:
> > > On 3 Oct 2022 19:29:36 -0700 John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
> > > >
> > > > Why would ksoftirqd preempt the rt task?
> > > >
> > > For example the kthread becomes sensitive to latency.
> > 
> > Is it the case where
> > the ksoftirqd thread is configured to run at higher rtprio?
> > 
> Yes, you are right.

I don't see a problem here. If a sys-admin configures their ksoftirqds to be
a higher priority RT tasks than the audio threads, then they better know what
they're doing :-)

The issue at hand here is that the softirqs boundedness is hard to control. And
the scheduling delays ensued are hard to deal with by any sys-admin.

Networking has actually introduced some knobs to help control that - but the
tricky bit of still being able to deliver high throughput networking while
keeping the softirq bounded to minimize scheduling delays/latencies. I think
even for PREEMPT_RT, high performance networking could be impacted to achieve
the required low latency.

See this paper which explores this duality:

	https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.702.7571&rep=rep1&type=pdf


With WiFi 6 and 5G mobile networks, phones are actually expected to deliver
multi-gigabit network throughputs.


Cheers

--
Qais Yousef